Imam Husain(A.S.)-The Chief of Martyrs

Nasibies are doing non stop propaganda that People of Kufa (i.e. Shias) were disloyal to Hussain and Hussain was killed due to them (This is a false accusation upon Shias and please read the reality in this Article ).  It is time to show Nasibies the Mirror.  Betrayal of Sahaba of Madina: They were Disloyal & Coward (i.e. Nasibi Taqayyah) & Killers of Uthman If Uthman was on Haq (right path), then there is no more Disloyalty & Cowardice that he was killed in the presence of thousands of Sahaba & Tabaeen of Madina.  Now Nasibies are welcome to comment upon the Bravery & Loyalty of these thousands of Sahaba & Tabaeen of Madina. [Note: For us, Uthman was absolutely not on right path, and it were these Sahaba & Tabaeen themselves who killed Uthman. But Nasibies don't accept it, so let them answer how then Uthman was murdered in presence of thousands of these Sahaba & Tabaeen of Madina.] Uthman's Dead Body was left to rot for 3 da

Maulana Tariq Jameel describing about the oppression done on Imam Hussain and His greatness and Crying while talking about the Mazloomiat of Imam Husain. He further said that we should be the follower of Imam Hussain and not of the accursed Yazid. Where is Zakir Naik? Where is the accursed person? See Zakir Naik, open your ears, and look at your ignorance ... and look at the words of Maulana Tariq Jameel

The 90-minute film records pilgrims' decisions, Ashura itself and the intense emotions of the Shia mourning of Hussain's death. It includes footage of the bombings and their aftermath. 

Assalam o Alikum Agar humaray upper kufr k fatway lagtay hain, hamain Kafir kaha jata hai, tou humay chahyay un asbaab ki taraf b mutawajah rahain. is topic ki ahmiyat is tarah bayan ki ja sakti hai k Mazhab e Tashayyu Dushman daar mazhab hai, Maslan agar koi fard Dushman daar ho tou wo apnay dushman se mohtaat rehta hai, aik lahzay k liay b apnay Dushman se gafil nahi rehta, kiun k gaflat ka nateeja halakat hai.. Lihaza agar hum apnay Dushman se gafil rahain tou humain hargiz yay gumaan nahi karna chahyay k humara Dushman b hum se Gafil ho gaya hai.. Humaray Dushman ki pahlay din se koshish rahi k humay Sunni Shia may taqseem kar dain, Shia or Sunni har do taraf is tarah k grouh ijaad kiyay jo aik dosray per kufr k fatway lagain, inho nay aisa mahool bana deya k aj Shia ka dushman Sunni, or Sunni ka sab se bara dushman Shia ha, humaray buzurg batatay hain (Mumkin ha is forum per bhi mojood hon ) k aj se 30, 35 saal pahlay azadari may sab shareek hotay thay, Shia

عاشورا کے خون بار واقعے سے تقریبا 14 صدیاں گذرنے کے باوجود، یا زخم ابھی آسمان و زمین میں تازہ کائنات پوری عزادار ہے سیدالشہداء امام حسین علیہ السلام کی۔ تازہ ترین عاشورائی واقعے میں اتوار 10 محرم الحرام 1434 (26/نومبر 2012) کو عاشورائے اباعبداللہ علیہ السلام کے موقع پر سیدالشہداء علیہ السلام کے میوزیم میں رکھی ہوئی قبر شریف امام حسین (ع) کی اصل تربت کا رنگ خون میں بدل گیا۔ یہ واقعہ عینی شاہدین کی حیرت زدہ آنکھوں کے سامنے اور عاشورائے حسینی کے موقع پر رونما ہوا اور میوزیم کے اہلکاروں نے اس واقعے کی تصدیق کی ہے اور اس واقعے کی تصویریں آستانۂ مقدسۂ حضرت علمدار کربلا ابوالفضل العباس علیہ السلام سے ویب سائٹ " الکفیل " نے شائع کی ہیں۔ نیز آیت اللہ العظمی سیستانی کے نمائندے اور آستانۂ امام حسین علیہ السلام کے متولی حجت الاسلام والمسلمین شیخ عبدالمہدی الکربلائی نے ذاتی طور پر میوزیم میں جاکر اس واقعے کا مشاہدہ کیا اور ہزاروں افراد نے میوزیم کا دورہ کیا۔ شیعہ اور سنی کتب میں منقولہ معتبر احادیث میں مروی ہے کہ جبرائیل امین (ع)

by Ali Jaffri In Surat Saafaat: 101-109, Allah says: We gave him (Hazrat Ibraheem A.S) the tidings of a son possessing forbearance (hilm). And when the son (Hazrat Ismail A.S) was old enough to walk about with him (some mufassireen have translated sa'ya as to work) (Ibraheem) said: “O my son I have a seen in a dream that I should sacrifice you (for the pleasure of Allah)". He (the son) responded: O my father! Do what you are commanded. If Allah pleases, you will find me of the patient ones." So when they had both submitted (to Allah), he (Ibraheem) flung him (his son) down upon his face. We called out to him saying: "O Ibraheem! You have indeed fulfilled the vision. Surely thus do We reward those who do good deeds Most surely that was tremendous (manifest) trial!”* Then We ransomed him (Ismail) with a great sacrifice (bidhibhin 'azeem). And we shifted (this blessing) on him (who is from) among the generations (to come) in la

Hum Shias matam kyuon Karte Hain ??

Exrtacted from : http://agniveer.com Infamous Zakir Naik -the Supporter of Yazeed (l.a.) Finally, the efforts of Agniveer to combat anti-national terror forces have yielded results. After detailed analyses of evil designs of promoter(s) of the threatening Peace TV made public by Agniveer, it has finally been banned by Intelligence Bureau, Government of India. To broadcast this channel now or support anti-India propaganda is a criminal offence. It was exactly three years ago when Agniveer spearheaded the intellectual crusade against open terrorism by radical Islamist Zakir Naik. As liberal and secular Indians, it was impossible for us to even imagine that, in India, someone can threaten apostates (those who change their religion) of death penalty or abuse gods and deities of other faiths or insult Prophet whom billions of devotees consider messenger of God. But all this happened and kept happening for years. A man called Zakir Naik continued to enjoy the freedom of

This is the interpretation of a tradition  found in Sahih Bukhari (the most revered book by Sunni) Holy Prophet said : "There will be twelve Caliph after me." Interpretation by Sunni Scholar According to Qazi Ayaaz., the import of the Messenger of Allah (s.a.w.a.) through the tradition concerning twelve Imams (a.s.) was that the twelve Imams (a.s.) will exist only during the caliphs’ might, the strength of Islam and the steadfastness of its affairs. This occurred when consensus was found among the people on this issue till the decline of the Bani Umayyah when mischief arose amongst them in the reign of Waleed Ibn Yazid. Ibn Hajar, in his Fath al-Baari, has opted for this interpretation citing the tradition ‘All of them (caliphs) will be the unanimous choice of the people’ as evidence for the same. Thereafter, he proceeds to mention the names of the caliphs, who enjoyed the consensus of the people: Abu Bakr, Umar, Usman, Ali (a.s.), Muawiyyah, Yazid, Abd a

Sahih Bukhari and Sahih Muslim are the two most revered Sunni books. The followers of these books claim that these are Sahih (all the traditions mentioned in these books are authentic and correct). Let us see in short what these two books have mentioned regarding the conduct of the Prophet (s.a.w.a.) with respect to mourning over the dead. Let us first see the tradition from Sahih-e-Muslim: Umme Salamah reported, “When Abu Salamah died I said, “I am a stranger in a strange land; I shall weep for him in a manner that would be talked of. I made preparation for weeping for him when a woman from the upper side of the city came there who intended to help me (in weeping). She happened to come across the Messenger of Allah (s.a.w.a.) who said, “Do you intend to bring the devil into a house from which Allah has twice driven him out? I (Umme Salamah), therefore, refrained from weeping and I did not weep. (Book #004, Hadith #2007) In the above tradition the Prophet (s.a.w

With the advent of Muharram, arrives the false propaganda against mourning and weeping over the dead from the so called followers of true Islam. While these Muslims disagree with the Shias on the point of whether to weep or not, let us see whether two of their very revered personalities, Umar and Ayesha had a common view on this issue. It is narrated from Saeed b. Musayyab that Ayesha mourned over her father after his death. When this news reached Umar, he ordered prohibition against it, but Ayesha rejected the caliph’s order. Then Hesham b. Walid was ordered to go to Ayesha and stop her from mourning loudly. As soon as the women acted as per Hesham’s order, they left the house and Umar addressed them saying, ‘Do you intend to chastise Abu Bakr by your weeping? Surely the dead are chastised due to weeping over them.’ (Sahih Tirmizi: tradition 1002) From the above incident it can be concluded that: 1. If the Prophet (s.a.w.a.) had actually prohibited weeping over t

A section of the Muslims who find themselves in a spot while defending Yazid’s role in killing Imam Husain (a.s.) make lame excuses and indulge in Shia-bashing as if maligning Shias is the answer to all their woes. Among their most ludicrous claims is that the Shias themselves killed Imam Husain (a.s.) and are now repenting for the same. Read the below 5 point article to this allegation against the Shias. Doubt A section of the Muslims who find themselves in a spot while defending Yazid’s role in killing Imam Husain (a.s.) make lame excuses and indulge in Shia-bashing as if maligning Shias is the answer to all their woes. Among their most ludicrous claims is that the Shias themselves killed Imam Husain (a.s.) and are now repenting for the same. Reply 1. Who killed Hamzah? 2. Role of companions 3. Yazid’s role 4. Who are the Shias? 5. Yazid’s forces were not Shias Who killed Hamzah (a.s.)? Who killed Ammar? This lame excuse reminds one of the argument advanced

علمائے اہل ِسنت (امام جلال الدین سیوطی،محدث شاہ عبدالعزیز دہلوی امام سعد الدین تفتازانی وغےرہ) کا اقرار کہ معاویہ باغی تھا اور اسکے علاوہ صحابی ِرسول حضرت عمار بن یاسر (رض) کی شہادت اس بات کا قطعی ثبوت ہے کہ معاویہ باغی تھا چلو ہم سلفیوں کے امام قاضی شوکانی کی کتابنیل الاوطار مے باغی کے بارے مے پڑھتے ہےں امام ِوقت کے خلاف بغاوت کرنا مسجد میں زنا کرنے کے مترادف ہے قاضی شوکانی نیل الاوطار، ج 7 ص 198 میں لکھتے ہیں: واعلم أن قتال البغاة جائز إجماعا كما حكي ذلك في البحر ولا يبعد أن يكون واجبا لقوله تعالى { فقاتلوا التي تبغي } وقد حكي في البحر أيضا عن العترة جميعا أن جهادهم أفضل من جهاد الكفار إلى ديارهم إذ فعلهم في دار الإسلام كفعل الفاحشة في المسجد یہ معلوم ہونا چاہیئے کہ اس بات پر اجماع ہے کہ باغی کے خلاف لڑنا جائز ہے جیسا کہ البحر میں درج ہے بلکہ اللہ تعالیٰ کے اس قول کے مطابق تو ایسا کرنا واجب ہے: "فقاتلوا التي تبغي" اور البحر میں یہ بھی درج ہے کہ تمام عترت کا کہنا ہے کہ باغیوں سے

مام جلال الدین سیوطی اپنی کتاب تاریخ خلفاء، ص 200 میں لکھتے ہیںI: زھری نماز ِعید کے حوالے سے کہتے ہیں کہ نماز سے قبل خطبہ دینے والا پہلا شخص معاویہ ہے۔ امام شافعی اپنی کتاب ’الام‘ ج ا ص 392 میں لکھتے ہیں أخبرنا الشافعي قال أخبرنا إبراهيم قال حدثني داود بن الحصين عن عبد الله بن يزيد الخطمي ‏(‏أن النبي -صلى الله عليه وسلم- وأبا بكر وعمر وعثمان كانوا يبتدئون بالصلاة قبل الخطبة حتى قدم معاوية فقدم الخطبة‏)‏۔ امام شافعی کہتے ہیں کہ عبداللہ بن یزید الخطمی کا قول ہے کہ رسول اللہ (ص)، ابو بکر، عمر اور عثمان خطبہ سے قبل نماز ادا کرتے تھے حتی کہ معاویہ آیا اور اس نے خطبہ کو نماز سے قبل کردیا ابن کثیر البدایہ والنہایہ، ج 8 ص 139 میں لکھتے ہیں: وقال قتادة‏:‏ عن سعيد بن المسيب‏:‏ أول من أذن وأقام يوم الفطر والنحر معاوية‏. قتادہ نے سعید بن المسیب سے بیان کیا ہے کہ معاویہ وہ پہلا شخص تھا جس نے عیدالفطر اور عیدالاضحیٰ کے دوران اذان اور اقامت کہی۔ امام ابن حجر عقسلانی نے فتح الباری شرح صحیح بخاری، ج 2 ص 529 میں اس معاملہ کو مزید واضح کیا ہے: اس بات پر اختلاف ہے کہ کس نے نماز ِعید

اللہ اکبر کیا اب بھی کسی ناصبی ابن تیمیہ کی اہلبیت (ع) دشمنی پر شک ہے؛؛؛ Written by Kamaal Haider

اس سوال کا جواب دینے سے پہلے چند امور کا تجزیہ کرنا لازم اور ضروری ہے تاکہ معلوم ہوجائے وہ اسباب و علل کیا تھے کہ جن کی وجہ سے امام حسین نے یزید کی بیعت کو ٹھکرا دیا، خداکا دین اور اپنے نانا کی شریعت کو بچانے کیلئے اپنی جان کی بازی لگادی سب سے پہلے ہم کو یہ دیکھنا ہے کہ بیعت کے معنی اور مفہوم کیا ہے ؟ بیعت کے لغوی معنی: منتہی الا رب میں بیعت کے معنی۔ عہد و پیمان۔کے لکھے ہیں اور بیعت لفظ باع کا مصدر ہے جس کے معنی ہیں فروخت کر دیا۔ چونکہ خرید و فروش میں دو فریق میں عہد و پیمان ہوتا ہے اور اس معاملہ میں دو چیزیں (ایک دوسرے کے عوض میں )بیچنے اور خریدنے والے کے درمیان منتقل ہوتی ہیں تو اس کے معنی ہوئے طرفین کے درمیان عہد وپیمان اور دو چیزوں کا ایک دوسرے کی طرف منتقل ہونا ۔ جس کو قانونی زبان میں بدل کہتے ہیں ۔کوئی بھی معاملہ بغیر بدل کے جائز نہیں اور جس معاہدۂ بیع کی بنیاد پر بیعت کو قائم کیا گیا ہے اس میں بھی یہی شرط ہوتی ہے معاملۂ بیع قرآن شریف میں اس طرح ذکر ہوا ہے ۔ ومن الناس من یشری نفسہ ابتغاء مرضات اللہ ۔ اس بیع وشریٰ میں دونوں طرف سے حصول بدل ہے ۔ ایک فریق نے اپنا نفس

شیخ ناصر الدین البانی نے اپنے سلسلة الأحاديث الصحيحة میں رسول اللہ [ص] کی غیب کی پیشنگوئیوں کے حوالہ سے عنوان قائم کیا ھے جسکے ذیل میں ابن ابی عاصم کے طریق سے ایک روایت کی تخریج کری ھے رسول خدا [ص] نے فرمایا کہ پہلا شخص جو میری سنت کو تبدیل کرے گا وہ بنی امیہ سے ہوگا۔ شیخ البانی نے اس حدیث کی سند کو صحیح کہا ھے جبکہ حدیث کے متن کے حوالہ سے شیخ البانی لکھتے ہیں کہ شاید اس حدیث میں تبدیلی سے خلیفہ کے انتخاب کے طریقہ کار کی تبدیلی اور خلافت کو میراث بنالینا مراد ہو ۔ سلسلة الأحاديث الصحيحة//جلد4//صفحہ329//طبعہ مکتبہ معارف ریاض۔ ہماری نظر میں شیخ البانی کی یہ تاویل فاسد ھے جسکی رکاکت ظاہر ھے کیونکہ سنت رسول [ص] کے اسوہ حسنہ سے تعبیر ھے جسکا خلیفہ کے انتخاب کے طریقہ کار سے دور کا بھی کوئی تعلق نہی ھے۔

As Ahlebait Tv celebrated a yazid murdabaad day, they were being taken to court by noor tv and islam tv . I was a bit supporised that yazid inspite of knowing the history these people still support yazid Astakfaar. Yazid was there ancester and they inherit their genes from him so no wonder why they don't feel the pain of Ahlebait A.s. But let me remind you of some the crimes committed by that dreadful Beast Yazid(the hero of the Kafir Zakir Naik)   Dreadful Crimes of Yazid Ibne Muawiya   The First Dreadful Crime: Killing Abu Abdillah Al-Husain (as). Yazid son of Muawiya with that inhuman and wicked qualities in his first year of his rule martyred the “Leader of the Youth of the Paradise” Abu Abdullah al-Husain(A.S.) and his family and companions in that tragic state. The Second Dreadful Crime: Killing and raping thousands of Residents of Madina and Desecrating Masjid Nabavi In his second year of his rule he created the deplorable incident of “Harrah” which b

The lovely 'S haikhs' of nasibi/wahabis Uthman al-Khamis who claimed that they love Ahlu-bait (a.s) wrote Amirilmuminin before the name of Yazid. They have opened a whole chapter in defence of Yazid b. Muawiyah (la) in his false book "Hiqbah min at-Tarikh". And chapter is named: خلافة أمير المؤمنين يزيد بن معاوية "The succession of Amirilmuminin Yazid" And i'd like to inform you that there are many books which refutes the false attacks of al-Khamis and one of this books is Reply to the book Hiqba min at-Tarikh - Radd al-nafis ala abaṭil ‘Uthman al-Khamis  Dear Arabic Readers Please feel free to read and download the following book :    Yazeed The second volume of the same book : Yazeed-the accursed one

یزید خلیفہ ابوبکر عمر عثمان سے افضل تھا یزید سنیوں کا وہ واحد خلیفہ ہے جس کا انتخاب پہلی بار امت کے عام استصواب سے ہوا - بغض یزید سے دور رہیں ورنہ بغض یزید کی وجہ سے جہنم میں جانا پڑے گا

The Sayyid speaks about the origin of the fast of Ashura and misconceptions.

من هم قتلة الحسیشی نعة الكوفة

Qiyam Imam Hussain(a.s.)

Words of Wisdom From Imam Hussain

Shion Par Kya Guzri? By Agha Mehdi Lakhnavi

Sub Ke Hussain (A.S)

By: Bintul Huda The book the Anglo-Saxon Chronicle, written in year 1954, contains the historical events that occurred to the British nation since the time of Jesus Christ (peace be upon him). The book mentions for every year the events happened during it until it comes on the mention of the events happened during the year of 685 after Christ and it is the year of 61 Hijri – the year of martyrdom of the grandson of holy Prophet Muhammad (peace be upon him & his progeny), Al-Imam Abi Abdellahil Hussein (peace be upon him) -, then the author mentions that in this year the sky rained blood and the people in Britain found that milk and butter turned to the blood!!!  Here are pictures from the book and the intended page.

Ayatullah Khoei Here are some of hundreds of Fatawa, or verdicts, by eminent marajay of Shiite World regarding Azadari of Chief of Martyrs: Grand Ayatullah ash-Sheikh Muhammad Hussain an-Naa’ini (The teacher of the Marajay of the holy city of Najaf) “There is no doubt as to the permissibility of the beating of the chest and the face with the hands to the point of redness or blackness (of the chest or the face). This is also extended to the lashing of the shoulders and the back with chains to the extent mentioned (above), and even if this led to bleeding. As for causing the bleeding of the head by sword beating, this is also allowed provided it does not lead to endangering harm, such as unstoppable bleeding or harm to the scull, etc. as it is known amongst the experts in doing this (hitting on the head).” The above Fatwa by Grand Ayatullah ash-Sheikh Muhammad Hussain an-Naa’ini was endorsed and signed by the following eminent Marajay: Ayatullah al-Udhma as-Seyyid Mohsen al-Hakim, A

An Analysis of Hadeeth of Constantinople presented by Nasibin in favor of Yazeed. Maulana Ishaq (Ahle-Hadeeth Scholar) explains.

 by Ali Jaffri 12-04-2012 at 11:37 PM (2 Views)   A Sunni brother mentioned:   Imam Hussein (A.S) was truthful in his determination to change the munkar, but he was adviced by the likes of Ibn Abbas and Ibn Umar that he was overoptimistic with the people of Iraq and their help. Hussein, being a human who is not ma3soom like the prophets, exercised his Ijtihad. Our Reply :  Based on what is even reported by the Sunnis, Imam Hussein knew that he will be killed in Ashura in Karbala, and yet he went forward. Not only Imam Hussein, but also all the Prophets of God knew about the detail of this catastrophe. From Adam, to Noah, to Moses, to Zakariyya, to Yahya (John), to Muhammad, all cried for Imam Hussein (A.S) and remembered him on the day of Ashura. Imam Hussein, before he leaves Medina, saw the Messenger of Allah in dream who told him:     "Verily Allah willed to see you martyred. Verily Allah willed to see your family captives"     He knew that he will be killed