Imam Husain(A.S.)-The Chief of Martyrs

It is no news that Salafis love and revere Yazid ibn Mu'awiyah (la), the murderer of the Prophet's (as) family. Although they normally deny that they love him. But the fact that Dr. Zakir Naik, a world- famous Salafi, send blessings upon Yazid (la) speaks volumes. You cannot logically invoke Allah's blessings upon someone you hate! In fact, Zakir and all other Salafis consider him a Jannati, on account of a hadith fabricated by Imam al-Bukhari. We have dealt with that hadith here.

In this article, we are only going to copy-paste some posts by some good Sunnis about Yazid. Thank Allah, not every Sunni loves that illegitimate child. After reading all the posts, we invite our open-minded readers to balance Salafi attitude to Yazid against the reality. Are they really supposed to send Allah's blessings upon him (la)? Is he really a Jannati? The post is by a Sunni brother, and was copied from here :

states in the famous book on Jirah wa Tadil by Imam Ibn Hajr al Asqalani (rah)

قال يحيـى بن عبد الملك بن أبـي غنية أحد الثقات، ثنا نوفل بن أبـي عقرب ثقة قال: كنت عند عمر بن عبد العزيز فذكر رجل يزيد بن معاوية، فقال: قال أمير المؤمنين يزيد، فقال عمر: تقول أمير المؤمنين يزيد، وأمر به فضرب عشرين سوطاً

Yahya bin Abdul Mulk bin Abi Ghania "WHO WAS AMONGST THIQA NARRATORS" he heard from Nawfl bin Abi Aqrab "WHO IS THIQA" he narrates: Once in the gathering of Umar Bin Abdul Aziz [R.A] people talked about Yazid bin Muawiya, someone among the people mentioned Yazid with the title of Ameer ul Momineen, hearing this Hadrat Umar bin Abdul Aziz [ra] replied (in anger): You have called Yazeed Amir Ul Mominein? Then he gave order of 20 lashes to be given to the person
[Imam Ibn Hajr al Asqalani in Tahdhib ut Tahdhib, Volume No. 6, Page No. 313].

Shaykh ul Islam Ibn Hajr Asqalani's (rah)

وأما المحبة فيه والرفع من شأنه فلا تقع إلا من مبتدع فاسد الاعتقاد فإنه كان فيه من الصفات ما يقتضي سلب الإيمان عمن يحبه لأن الحب في الله والبغض في الله من الإيمان والله المستعان
,
Loving and glorifying him is not done except by a heretic who has void belief because he (Yazid) had such characteristics that his lover deserves to be faithless, because to love and hate just in the sake of God is the sign of faith.

[al-Imta bil al-Arba'in, Page No. 96]

The heinous crimes of Yazid

Ibn Kathir then says in his Tarikh under events of 63 AH

فقال ابن الزبير يا هؤلاء قتل أصحابكم فانا لله وإنا إليه راجعون

وقد أخطأ يزيد خطأ فاحشا فى قوله لمسلم بن عقبة أن يبيح المدينة ثلاثة أيام وهذا خطأ كبير فاحش مع ما انضم إلى ذلك من قتل خلق من الصحابة وأبنائهم وقد تقدم أنه قتل الحسين وأصحابه على يدى عبيد الله بن زياد وقد وقع فى هذه الثلاثة أيام من المفاسد العظيمة فى المدينة النبوية مالا يحد ولا يوصف مما لا يعلمه إلا الله عز وجل وقد أراد بارسال مسلم بن عقبة توطيد سلطانه وملكه ودوام أيامه من غير منازع فعاقبه الله بنقيض قصده وحال بينه وبين ما يشتهيه فقصمه الله قاصم الجبابرة وأخذه أخذ عزيز مقتدر وكذلك أخذ ربك إذا أخذ القرى وهى ظالمة إن أخذه أليم شديد

Translation: Hadrat Ibn Zubayr (Radhi Allaho Anho) said: O PEOPLE YOUR COMPANIONS HAVE BEEN KILLED – Inna Lillahi Wa Inna Ilaihi Rajiun

"Yazeed committed a mistake and that too a disgusting one by ordering Muslim bin Uqba to make Medina Mubah for three days. This was the biggest blunder. Many Sahaba and their children were slaughtered. As it has been mentioned before that Yazid made UbaydUllah Ibn Ziyad kill the grandson of Rasulullah (saw) Husayn and his companions, and in those three days huge heinous crimes happened in Madina about which nobody knows except Allah]. Yazeed wanted to secure his governance by sending Muslim bin Uqbah but Allah did against his wishes and punished him. Verily Allah killed him likewise Allah made grip over the oppressing towns, no doubt His grip is painful and strict

[Al Bidayah Wal Nihayah, Vol 8 Page 283]

Even Ibn Ziyad testified against Yazid

Yazid’s crimes were so heinous that even his loyal UbaidUllah Ibn Ziyad (whom he had sent to murder Muslim bin Aqeel and later Imam Hussain ra too) said:

كان يزيد كتب إلى عبد الله بن زياد أن يسير إلى الزبير فيحاصره بمكة فأبى عليه وقال والله لا أجمعهما للفاسق أبدا أقتل ابن بنت رسول الله ص وأغزو البيت الحرام وقد كانت أمه مرجانة قالت له حين قتل الحسين ويحك ماذا صنعت وماذا ركبت وعنفته تعنيفا شديدا قالوا وقد بلغ يزيد أن ابن الزبير يقول فى خطبته يزيد القرود شارب الخمور تارك الصلوات منعكف على القينات

Translation:When Yazid wrote to Abdullah Ibn Ziyad that he should go to Makkah and besiege Abdullah Ibn Zubayr (RA) he refused to do so and said: By Allah I will not combine two things for a Fasiq (i.e. Yazid). I have already killed the son of Prophet (salallaho alaihi wasalam)’s daughter (on his order) and now (he asks me to) wage war on Bayt ul Harram? However when he martyred Imam Hussain (RA) his mom Marjana said to him: May you die! what have you done and what crime have you committed, she also scolded him severely. Yazid was informed that Abdullah Ibn Zubayr (RA) used to say in his speeches that Yazid was a fraud, drunkard, one who abandons Salaat and one who stays with singing women.

[Ibn kathir's , Al-Bidayah Wal Nihayah, Volume 8, Page No 279]

Opression upon Sahaba and greatest Tabiyeen

ثم أباح مسلم بن عقبة الذى يقول فيه السلف مسرف بن عقبة قبحه الله من شيخ سوء ما أجهله المدينة ثلاثة أيام كما أمره يزيد لا جزاه الله خيرا وقتل خيرا خلقا من أشرافها وقرائها وانتهب أموالا كثيرة منها ووقع شر وفساد عريض على ما ذكره غير واحد فكان ممن قتل بين يديه صبرا معقل بن سنان وقد كان صديقه قبل ذلك ولكن أسمعه فى يزيد كلاما غليظا فنقم عليه بسببه

Translation: And he Muslim bin Uqba who is known as As-Salf Musraf bin Uqba, May Allah not do well to this leader of evil and ignorance, he made Madina legal for 3 days on the order of Yazid. May Allah also not grant Jaza and khayr to him(i.e. Yazid), he got many righteous killed and also looted the amwaal in Madina in great numbers, this has been multiply narrated that he created a lot of Shar and Fasad. It is mentioned that Hadrat Muafl bin Sanan (RA) was tied infront (of Ibn Uqba) and then martyred, you were his friend before but later you used strong words against Yazid due to which he became angry at you.

[Ibn kathir's in Al-Bidayah Wal Nihayah, Volume 8, Page No 280]

Yazeed’s aggression against the leading Tabi’i i.e. Saeed Ibn Musaib (ra)

قال المدائنى وجىء إلى مسلم بسعيد بن المسيب فقال له بايع فقال أبايع على سيرة أبى بكر وعمر فأمر بضرب عنقه فشهد رجل إنه مجنون فخلى سبيله

Translation:Al Mudaini (rah) said: Sa’eed Ibn Musaib (rah) was brought to Muslim (bin uqba), He asked him to give bayah. (Sa’eed ibn Musab) said: I will give bayah on seerah of Sayyidna Abu Bakr and Sayyidna Umar (RA). (Muslim) ordered to get him killed but a man said This person (i.e. Sa’eed ibn Musaib) is a mad man (i.e. to save him), at this he was left alone.

[Ibn kathir in Al Bidayah Wal Nihayah, Volume 8, Page No 281]

**Imam Ahmed Bin hanbal [rah] belief from Allama Aloosi (Rahimuhullah) writes under 47:22-23 in his magnificent Ruh ul Ma’ani

واستدل بها أيضاً على جواز لعن يزيد عليه من الله تعالى ما يستحق. نقل البرزنجي في «الإشاعة» والهيتمي في «الصواعق» أن الإمام أحمد لما سأله ولده عبد الله عن لعن يزيد قال كيف لا يلعن من لعنه الله تعالى في كتابه؟ فقال عبد الله قد قرأت كتاب الله عز وجل فلم أجد فيه لعن يزيد فقال الإمام إن الله تعالى يقول:
{ فَهَلْ عَسَيْتُمْ إِن تَوَلَّيْتُمْ أَن تُفْسِدُواْ فِي ٱلأَرْضِ وَتُقَطّعُواْ أَرْحَامَكُمْ * أَوْلَـئِكَ ٱلَّذِينَ لَعَنَهُمُ ٱللَّهُ }
[محمد: 22] الآية وأي فساد وقطيعة أشد مما فعله يزيد؟

Translation:The Proof of sending Lanah upon Yazid is derived from this (ayah), as was mentioned by Al-Barzanji (rah) in his Al-Ashaat and Imam Haythami (rah) in As-Sawaiq from Imam Ahmed (rah) that his son Abdullah asked him about sending Lanah on Yazid, (Imam Ahmed) said: Why cannot Lanah be sent on him when Allah has sent Lanah on him in Quran, Abdullah (rah) said: Recite the Kitab of Allah so that I know how Lanah is sent on Yazid, Imam Ahmed (rah) mentioned these verses: Would ye then, if ye were given the command, work corruption in the land and sever your ties of kinship? Such are the men whom Allah has cursed…(47:22-23) Hence could there be a bigger Strife than what Yazid did?[

[Ruh ul Ma’ani by Imam Al-Alusi, Volume 9 Under Surah Muhammad 22-23]

**Imam Dhahabi (rah) writes about Yazid**

وكان ناصبيا فظا غليظا جلفا يتناول المسكر ويفعل المنكر افتتح دولته بمقتل الشهيد الحسين واختتمها بواقعة الحرة فمقته الناس ولم يبارك في عمره وخرج عليه غير واحد بعد الحسين كأهل المدينة قاموا لله

Translation:He (Yazid) was a disgusting Nasibi (i.e. those who hate Ahlul bayt). He drank and did evil. He started his kingdom with the killing of the Shahid al-Hussain (RA) and ended it with the incident of al-Harra (i.e. besiegement of Madina which also makes him directly liable for Lanah as sahih ahadith prove). Hence the people hated him, he was not blessed in his life, and many took up arms against him after Imam Hussain (RA) such as the people of Madina - they rose for the sake of Allah

[As Siyar al Alam an Nabula, Volume No. 4, Page No. 37-38]

Khalida bin al Mu'ammar:
,
"When the Commander of Syria [Mu'awiya [ra] ] initiated his desire [to appoint Yazeed] the tribe of Rabia opposed this and the tribe of Abid al Qays joined them (i.e. refused to give bayya). The tribe of Barr bin Wa'l and the tribe of Khalid bin al Mu'ammar also joined in opposition. When the tribe of Rabia refused to give bayya other Arab tribes followed

[ in Talkhees Ibn Asakir Volume 5 page 92 Dhikr ]
,
Should we still believe Yazid was choosen by Ijma of Sahaba [ra] , No he forced them by killing them ,

Also in al Bidaya Volume 7 page 79 Dhikr events of 54 Hijri

"5 people rejected the bayya to Yazeed.

1. Abdur Rahman bin Abu Bakr
2. Abullah bin Umar
3. Abdullah bin Zubayr
4. Abdullah bin Abbas
5. Husayn bin 'Ali

in Muruj al Dhahab:
,
"Due to his hatred of Allah (swt) Yazeed openly drank alcohol. In his deeds he followed the Seerah of Pharoah, but Pharoah was more just to his own subjects."
,
Wafyat al-Ayan Volume 3 page 287 Also known as Tarikh Ibn Khalkan testimony of the great Sunni scholar Ibn Khalkan:
,
وهو اللاعب بالنرد والمتصيد بالفهود ومدمن الخمر، وشعره في الخمر معلوم
,
"Yazeed would hunt with cheetas play chess and drink alcohol and had famous poems about alcohol".

testimony of Hassan al-Basri in Tarikh Abul Fida, Volume 1 page 288:
,
يزيد وكان سكيراً خميراً يلبس الحرير ويضرب بالطنابير
,
"Yazeed drank alcohol, wore silk and played the tambourine".

in Hayaat al Haywaan:

وهو المتصيد بالفهد واللاعب بالنرد ومدمن الخمر

"Yazeed would hunt with cheetas, play chess and drink alcohol".
,
Hadrat Ameer Mu'awiya [ra] also knew that Yazeed drank alcohol

Yazeed in his youth indulged in alcohol consumption and used to do other things youth would do, and this came to the attention of Mu'awiya [ra] who wanted to advise him warmly so he said to him: 'O my son, you do have capability of achieving what you want without disgrace and debasement, [contineues]
,
[ibn khatir in 'Al Bidayah wa al Nihaya' (Urdu) Vol 8 page 1156 ]

Scan pages of 'Al Bidayah wa al Nihaya' (Urdu) Vol 8 page 1156
,

More from Imam Dhahabi

Imam Dhahabi Writes: Ziyad Haarthi narrated: 'Yazid gave me alcohol to drink, I had never drunk alcohol like that before and I enquired where he had obtained its ingredients from'. Yazid replied: 'it is made of sweet pomegranate, Isfahan's honey, Hawaz's sugar, Taif's grapes and Burdah's water'. Ahmed bin Masama' narrated: 'Once Yazid drank alcohol and started to dance, suddenly he fell down and his nostril began to bleed'.
[Siyar al A'lam wa al Nubalah, Volume 004, Page No. 037]

Imam Dhahabi, Tarikh al-Islam: wa-tabaqat al-mashahir wa-al-a`lam, Publish: Dar al Mughni, Beirut, Lebanon

Imam Dhahabi (rah) writes: I say: 'When Yazid did to the people of Madina what he did and killed al-Hussain and his brothers and progeny, and Yazid drank alcohol, and performed abominable things, then the people hated him and rose up against him more than once. God didn't bless his life and Abu Bilal Mirdas bin Adya al-Hanzali rose against him.'

[Tarikh al-Islam: wa-tabaqat al-mashahir wa-al-a`lam, Volume 005, Page No. 30]

Allama Alusi said:

And I say what is prevalent over my mind that (Yazid) Khabith did not testify to the messengership of the Holy Prophet (Peace Be Upon Him). According to me it is correct to curse a person like Yazid, although one cannot imagine a Fasiq like him and apparently he never repented, the possibility of his repentance is weaker than the possibility of his faith (Iman). Along with Yazid, Ibn Ziyad, Ibn Sa'ad and his group shall also be included. Verily, may Allah's curse be upon all of them, their friends, their supporters, their group and upon everyone who inclines towards them until Qayamah and until an eye sheds a tear for Abu Abdullah Hussain (ra).
[Tafsir Ruh al-Ma'ani, Volume 26, Page No. 73]

Ala Hadrat Imam Ahmed Raza ( رحمة الله عليه ) called Yazid as Paleed!

Imam Ala Hadrat Ahmed Ridha Khan Fadhil Baraili (rah) said: Yazeed was Paleed (disgusting) was Qat’an and Yaqeenan (Absolutely and with conviction) Ba Ijmah (with consensus) of Ahlus Sunnah a “FASIQ O FAJIR (Sinner and Transgressor)” who committed “KABAIR (BIG) SINS” On this do the Ahlus Sunnah have agreement, however in his Takfir on Lanah there is dispute. “IMAM AHMED BIN HANBAL (RA) AND HIS COMPANIONS CALL HIM KAFIR AND THEY DO THAT BY CURSING HIM WITH NAME AND THEY DO ISTADLAL FROM THIS AYAH”Then, is it to be expected of you, if ye were put in authority, that ye will do mischief in the land, and break your ties of kith and kin? Such are the men whom Allah has cursed for He has made them deaf and blinded their sight. [Quran 47:22-23]

“THERE IS NO DOUBT THAT YAZID DID FASAD WHEN HE BECAME RULER” rather he utterly disrespected the Haramayn Tayibayn, the Ka’ba itself and the blessed shrine of Prophet (Peace be upon him). He tied horses in Masjid an Nabwi due to which the urine of them even spilled over the pulpit (Naudhobillah), for three days Adhaan and prayer was stopped in Masjid an Nabwi, he got thousands of innocent Sahaba martyred in Makkah, Madina and Hijaaz, got stones being thrown of Ka’ba, got the Ghulaaf torn and burnt, This “KHABEETH” made the pure and pious ladies of madina as Halal for his army (i.e. to do Zina .. AstaghfirUllah), he kept the loved one of Prophet as thirsty and hungry for 3 days and then got him slaughtered along with his companions. The ones who were brought up in the lap of Prophet, he made the horses trample their bodies (AstaghfirUllah)

The blessed face of Imam Hussain (ra) which was used to be kissed by Prophet, it was gotten cut and put on a spear and displayed it to public…

Imam Ahmed Raza (rah) after proving all this said (Please note the honesty of this Imam in Fiqh): Imam Ahmed and his Companions send Lanah on Yazid whereas our Imam Abu Hanifa (rah) has done “SUKOOT” over calling him Kafir or sending Lanah upon him, due to “CAUTION” but clarified that him being “FASIQ AND FAJIR” is prove from “TAWATUR” but Kufr is not Mutawatir, so whosoever does not (Consider him kafir) will not be held responsible but Whosoever rejects that he was Fasiq o Fajir and puts blame on the Malzoom Imam Hussain (ra) is “CLEARLY AGAINST THE FUNDAMENTALS OF AHLUS SUNNAH AND DOES ZALALAT AND IS FROM BAD MADHAB” rather this could never come from the heart of person who has the lamp of Prophet (Peace be upon him)’s love

[Imam Ahmed Ridha Fadhil Baraili, Fatawa al Ridhwiyyah, Volume No. 14, Pages:591-592, Published Lahore, Pakistan]

Debunking Zakir Naik claim regarding bukhari hadith

some misquotethis hadith to prove yazid jannati
,
""He heard the Prophet saying, 'Paradise is granted to the first batch of my followers who will undertake a naval expedition.' The Prophet then said, 'The first army amongst my followers who will invade Caesar's City will be forgiven their sins.'" (Sahih Bukhari volume 4 hadith 175)

REPLY
,
► First attack on Caesar's city was in 42 hijri. Second attack was in 43 and "Hazrat Bosr ben ABI Arka was the leader of this army.

► Third attack was in 44 and this was led by Abdurehman ben Khalid ben Waleed. The next attack was in 46 hijri which was led by Maalik ben Abdurehman and Abdurehman ben Khalid ben Waleed.

► In 47 next attack was led by Maalik ben Hobaira and Abdurehman ben Qaiymi. In 49 hijri 3 rome was attacked for 3 times. and lastly yazid was in attack of 50 hijri.

Hazrat Amir Mawiya (RA) arrested Yazeed and sent him to ceasar because Yazeed was used to make fun of Mujahideen and as a punishment Yazeed was sent there not for Jihad
,
So Yazeed was in the seventh attack, not in the first attack and in Bukhari Shareef it is mentioned that 'The first army amongst' my followers who will invade Caesar's City will be forgiven their sins.'

Yazidis misuse the hadith of Bukhari and try to send him to paradise
,
Let’s see explanation of hadith through another sahih hadith

عن أسلم أبي عمران قال : غزونا من المدينة نريد القسطنطينية وعلى الجماعة عبد الرحمن بن خالد بن الوليد

Translation: Aslam Abi Imran (ra) said: We went out on an expedition from Madina towards Constantinople. Abdur-Rahman bin Khalid bin Walid was the (leader) over our group.
[Sunnan Abu Dawud, Volume No. 2 Hadith # 2512, Albani declared it Sahih in his Takhrij]
,
The hadith of Bukhari does not mention name of Yazid so the lovers of Yazid just falsely assume a merit of him, however this sahih hadith of Abu Dawud mentions Abdur Rahman bin Khalid bin Walid by name, so without any shadow of doubt the Fasiq/Fajir Yazid loses this merit which his lovers try to attribute towards him.
,
from Tarikh at Tabri itself

It states under events of “44 AH”

فمما كان فيها من ذلك دخول المسلمين مع عبد الرحمن بن خالد بن الوليد بلاد الروم ومشتاهم بها وغزو
,
Translation: In (44 AH) The Muslims with Abdur Rahman bin Khalid bin Walid entered Rome and the Ghazwa took place
[Tarikh at-Tabri under events of 44 AH]

still let’s see how this Yazid went later
,
Imam Ibn Al-Atheer (rah) writes:

في هذه السنة وقيل ‏:‏ سنة خمسين سير معاوية جيشًا كثيفًا إلى بلاد الروم للغزاة ، وجعل عليهم سفيان بن عوف ، وأَمَرَ ابنه يزيد بالغزاة معهم فتثاقل واعتلّ فأمسك عنه أبوه ، فأصاب الناس في غزاتهم جوعٌ ومرض شديد ، فأنشأ يزيد يقول ‏:‏
ما إن أبالي بما لاقت جموعهم *** بالفرقدونة من حمى ومن موم
إذا اتكأت على الأنماط مرتفقًا *** بدير مروان عندي أم كلثومِ
فبلغ معاوية شعره، فأقسم عليه ليلحقنّ بسفيان في أرض الروم، ليصيبه ما أصاب الناس، فسار ومعه جمع كثير أضافهم إليه أبوه
,
In this year i.e. 49 AH or 50 AH, Muawiya (رضّى الله عنه) sent a huge army towards Rome. He made Sufyan bin Awf (ra) as its commander and he ordered his son Yazid to go with them, however Yazid “ACTED TO HAVE BECOME SICK AND DENIED TO GO” When the warriors were struck with harsh hunger and diseases, Yazid (mockingly) said this poetry:

At Farqudwana immense wrath covered them, whether they had fever or whatever I don’t care because I am sitting on a high carpet and Umm ul Kulthum (one of his wives) is between my armpits.
,
When Ameer Muawiya (رضّى الله عنه) heard these phrases he made Yazid to take an oath and join Sufyan bin Awf in Rome so that “HE COULD ALSO BE STRUCK BY THESE SAME DIFFICULTIES AS THE WARRIORS OF ISLAM HAD FACED (THIS WAS PUNISHEMENT TO YAZID)” Yazid became helpless and he had to go and Ameer Muawiya (رضّى الله عنه) sent another army with him

[Tarikh Ibn al Atheer, Volume No.3, Page No. 131]

Tarikh al-Rusul wa al-Muluk or Tarikh at-Tabari, Publish By Cairo: Dar al-Ma'arif

The scan is of Tarikh at-Tabari under events of 44AH (i.e. 5-6 years before Yazid was forcefully sent as punishment) It states: The Incidents which took place in 44 AH In (44 AH) The Muslims with Abdur Rahman bin Khalid bin Walid entered Rome and the Ghazwa took place

[Tarikh at-Tabari under events of 44 AH, Volume 005, Page No. 212: Published by Cairo: Dar al-Ma'arif]

Here is another proof from Imam al-Hafidh Jalal-ud-din Suyuti ( رحمة الله عليه )

Translation:You (Imam Hussain - Radhi Allaho Anho) were martyred and your head was brought to Ibn Ziyad on a plate. "May Allah's Lanah (Curse) be upon the person who killed you, Ibn Ziyad "AND UPON YAZID"

[As-Suyuti in Tarikh ul Khulafa, Page No. 165]

Translation:Nawfl bin Abi Firaat (rah) said that once he was sitting with Caliph Umar bin Abdul Aziz (rah) when a man called Yazid as "Ameer ul Momineen Yazid bin Muawiya" at this (Umar bin Abdul Aziz said in anger): YOU CALL THIS PERSON AS AMEER UL MOMINEEN?! and then he ordered the person to be "LASHED 20 TIMES"…in 63 AH Yazid got to know that people of Madina have rejected him and are preparing to revolt against him, knowing this Yazid sent a huge army to Madina and "DECLARED WAR UPON IT’S PEOPLE"after looting in Madina he sent the army to martyr Hadrat Abdullah bin Zubayr (ra) in Makkah and so the incident of "HURRA" took place, do you know what Hurra is? Regarding it Hassan (a Tabi'i) said: When Madina was attacked, there remained not a single person who was safe from it, "HUGE AMOUNT OF SAHABA AND OTHERS WERE MARTYRED PLUS MADINA WAS LOOTED AND THOUSANDS OF VIRGIN GIRLS WERE RAPED" Inna Lillahi Wa Inna Ilaihi Rajiun.

The Prophet (Peace be upon him) said: Whosoever frightens People of Madina then Allah will frighten them (the attackers) plus Curse (Lanah) of Allah, his Angels and all the people is upon such a person (Sahih Muslim) the reason why people of Madina did not give bayah to Yazid was because he was indulged in “TOO MANY SINS” Imam Waqidi (rah) narrates fromAbdullah Bin Khazlatal Ghusail (a Sahabi) that he said: By Allah we did not revolt against Yazid until we were sure that “WE WILL BE SHOWERED WITH STONES FROM SKY” (the Yazidans) started to do Nikah with their mothers, sisters and daughters, they started to drink openly and neglected prayers! Imam Dhahabi (rah) said: When Yazid did such things with people of Madina although “ HE WAS INDULGED IN DRINKING AND OTHER EVIL DEEDS EVEN BEFORE” then the people of Makkah also revolted against him and rose against him from 4 sides and then Allah did not put Barakah in life of Yazid (Then it mentions that Yazid attacked Makkah and got the Abdullah Ibn Zubayr Martyred)

[As-Suyuti, Tarikh ul Khulafa, Page No. 167]

Please remember first the hadith of Thaqlain, where Rasool (saw) asked the people to watch out how they deal with Ahl al-Bayt.

Sahih Muslim, part 7, Kitab fada'il alSahabah [Maktabat wa Matba`at Muhammad `Ali Subayh wa Awladuhu: Cairo] pp. 122-123

أما بعد، ألا أيها الناس فإنّما أنا بشر يوشك أنْ يأتي رسول ربي فأجيب، وأنا تارك فيكم ثقلين: أولهما كتاب الله فيه الهدى والنور، فخذوا بكتاب الله واستمسكوا به» فحثّ على كتاب الله ورغّب فيه، ثم قال: «وأهل بيتي، أذكركم الله في أهل بيتي، أذكركم الله في أهل بيتي، أذكركم الله في أهل بيتي

O people, I am only a human being and I am about to respond to the messenger of my Lord [i.e. the call of death]. I am leaving behind Two Precious Things (Thaqalayn) among you. The first of the two is the Book of Allah. In it is guidance and light. So get hold of the Book of Allah and adhere to it." (The narrator, Zayd ibn al-Arqam said: Then he urged and motivated (us) regarding the Book of Allah . Then he said), "And my Ahl al-Bayt (family). I urge you to remember Allah regarding my Ahl al-Bayt. I urge you to remember Allah regarding my Ahl al-Bayt. I urge you to remember Allah regarding my Ahl al-Bayt

Now read this hadith:

Sunnan Ib Maja (Vol,1 page 517 Al Tazia,Egypt):

Narrated by Alqamah from Abdullah bin Masood:

One day we were sitting with Holy Prophet(s) when some children from the house of Bani Hashim came there. When the Holy Prophet(s) saw them, tears welled up in his eyes and he became pale.
Ibn Masood said that he told the Holy Prophet(s) "Your face reflects axiety".The Holy Prophet(s) stated:"Exalted God has granted us,the Ahlulbait, Hereafter instead of wordly pleasure.
After me,soon my Ahlubait will face calamity,harship and misery till people having black flags will rise from East and seek justice,which will be denied them.They will wage war,they will be supported and will be given what they were demanding.They will not accept until it is handed over to one from our Ahlulbait (i.e. Mahdi) .He will fill the earth with justice as it was filled with unjustice.Whoever amongst you is alive at that period, should try to reach them even if he has to tread on ince in that persuit."

Talibani/Deobandi Claim

They claim that in ancient time "Khurassan" was indicated as "Khurasaan-e-Buzurg" and it consisted of Areas of Afghanistan (while Present Khurasaan contains sacred City of Mashhad). So it is Taliban who are mentioned in this hadith.
Wahabi Deobandies are doing a lot of Propaganda in Pakistan now-a-days by using this hadith. Therefore, let us analyse this hadith so that Batil should be made clear. Insha-Allah.

ANALYSIS of This Hadith

1) People of Ahle Bait (family of Prophet) will face calamity. (While Nasibi Deobandi Sapah Sahaba deny calamity of Fatima (salam Allah Alaiha), and also believe that YAZID is promised for Paradise due to fabricated hadith of First Naval War and Caesar's City (read it's fabrication here)

1.1) Rasool Allah started weeping upon the calmities of Ahle Bait, but here is Sapah Sahaba who never weeps for what happened to Hussain (as)

in Karbala.

Just see who are Ahle Bait? Were it wives of Muhammad (saw) who were driven out of their homes ? Or were it progeny of Muhammad (saw) who faced calmities?

2) People will rise to assist them with BLACK FLAGS [Need we to tell you who are the holder of these Black Flags throughout whole History in all these passing centuries?]

3) These people will come from EAST
[Another hadith says that from EAST, it means "KHURASAAN". This hadith has been quoted by Mawlana Israr Ahmad in his book "Shia Sunni Mufahimat ki ahmiat aur zaroorat"]

4) These people are those, who are SAD FOR THE Calamites upon Ahle Bait (family of Prophet), and they love Ahle Bait above all.

Need I still to tell you more who are the people who are SAD and thus indicated in these Ahadith of Mahdi ?

One more Hadith about Black Flags:

Dear brothers/sisters, Black Flag is Only the Sign of Shiaism, while all other Nasibies/Wahabies of Saudia have Bidati Flags.

One more authentic Hadith on this matter:

"Thawbaan reported that the Prophet (Sallallaahu `alayhi wa sallam) said, 'Three will fight for the your treasure (of the Ka`bah), each of them the son of a 'Khaleefah', it will be rendered to none of them. Then from the direction of the East will emerge black flags. Then they will fight you like they have fought none before.' Then some words were spoken which I did not remember. He then said, 'If you see him, give bay`ah to him even if you must crawl over ice. For, verily, he is the 'Khaleefah' of Allah (Khaleefatullaah), the Mahdi"

This Hadeeth is found in Ibn Maajah, Ahmad's Musnad, al-Haakim's Mustadrak and others. Now let us analyze the chain of narration found in Ibn Maajah's Sunan:

1) Reported to Ibn Maajah by both Muhammad bin Yahya and Ahmad bin Yusuf - Both reliable; Imam Muslim has said about Ahmad bin Yusuf, "He is reliable (thiqqah)." an-Nasaa'i has said, "There is no problem in him." ad-DaraaquTni has said, "Reliable and noble (thiqqah nabeel)."

2) `Abdur-Razzaq bin Hammaam as-San`aani - Reliable. Ahmad bin Hanbal was asked about him, "Have you seen anyone better in Hadeeth than `Abdur-Razzaaq?" He replied, "No".

3) Sufyaan ath-Thawri - Too reputable to record his merits. Very reliable. Shu`bah, Sufyaan bin `Uyaynah, Abu `AaSim an-Nabeel and YaHya ibn Ma`een among others said: "Sufyaan is the 'Ameer al-Mu'mineen" of Hadeeth"!

4) Khaalid bin Mahraan al-Hathaa' - Reliable. Ahmad bin Hanbal has said, "Trustworthy (thabt)." Ibn Ma`een and an-Nasaa'i have both said, "Reliable (thiqqah)."

5) Abi Qulaaba Abdullaah bin Zayd al-Harrami - Reliable. Muhammad bin Sa`d has said in his "at-Tabaqah ath-Thaaniyah min Ahl al-Basrah" about him, "He was reliable (thiqqah)."

6) Abu Asmaa' `Amroo bin Marthad ar-RaHabi - Reliable. al-`Ijly has said about him, "Shaami, Tabi`ee, Reliable (thiqqah)."

7) Thawbaan - Companion and servant of the Prophet (Sallallaahu `alayhi wa sallam).

8) The Prophet (Sallallaahu `alayhi wa sallam).

["Tahtheeb al-Kamaal" of al-Mizzi and "Tahtheeb at-Tahtheeb" of Ibn Hajar were referenced for verification of the Narrators]

The Flag of Rasool Allah (saw) was of black colour

We are quoting from authentic work of Ahl'ul Sunnah "Sunnan Abu Dawud", vol 3, page 22, Kitab-ul-Jihad, and "Tirmidhi Shareef", vol. 1, page 528:

"There was a special flag of Rasool Allah (s), whose name was "Uqaab" and it consisted of curtain of Ayesha's house. And its colour was black."

It is written in book Akseer-ul-Abadaat, page 263:

" Ali told Malik-e-Ashtar that I have a Standard, which I never took out before. And it was the first Standard of Rasool Allah (saw) and he told me that a time will come when you will fight with rebels. Then Ali (as) took out that Standard, which became old. When people saw the Standard of Rasool (s), they started weeping in loud voice. And all those who found the way till Standard, they kissed it."

So, where are those who declare the Black Flag of Shias to be an Innovation. Where are the those who declare kissing the flag and weeping in loud voice to be an Innovation and misguidance.

Message from A Sunni Scholar : Shaykh Al- Ninowy

The following article is a message from Sayyidi Shaykh Muhammad bin Yahya al-Husayni Al- Ninowy (may Allah preserve and elevate him) written last year on the advent of Muharram. Since we have just entered the month of Muharram 1430, it would be appropriate to share this wonderful message on Muharram and the sacrifice of Imam Husayn (peace be upon him):

“Among the believers are Men, who delivered their promise to Allah” (Ayah 23/Surat Al-Ahzab)
If history has taught us anything, it has certainly delivered a message with unequivocal resonance; Haqq and freedom are not something that is given. Haqq and Freedom are things people take, and people are as free and on the Haqq as they want to be.

Virtues of Muharram And The Sacrifice Of Imam Husayn (RAA)
Bismillah Ar-Rahman Ar-Rahim

“Among the believers are Men, who delivered their promise to Allah” (Ayah 23/Surat Al-Ahzab)
If history has taught us anything, it has certainly delivered a message with unequivocal resonance; Haqq and freedom are not something that is given. Haqq and Freedom are things people take, and people are as free and on the Haqq as they want to be.

Islam, the religion of Haqq, justice and freedom came ito a place and time where oppression was the rule, slavery was a tool to humiliate the weak, killings a way to solve problems. A society fueled by feuds, raging by violence, and merely being born in the wrong family could mean eternal slavery, oppression, and stripping of any and all rights.

The Beloved Holy Prophet, sallallahu alayhi wa aalihi wa sallam, emerged as the voice denouncing those ways while striving to ensure justice and equality.
By endangering himself, he -sallallahu alayhi wa aalihi wa sallam, gave us one of the most precious monotheistic gifts, namely the collective duty of self criticism.

Speak the truth though against yourself. Support the Haqq, denounce the Batel. Stand with the Haqq, abdondon the Batel.Stand up to oppressors and tyrants, no matter of the price.The Seerah of the Beloved Holy Prophet, sallallahu alayhi wa aalihi wa sallam, taken as a whole, may be summarized as a succession of victories of Haqq over Batel, of Justice over Tyranny, of Freedom over Slavery.

If the Beloved Prophet, sallallahu alayhi wa aalihi wa sallam, has taught us anything, then among the many, he taught us an important lesson.
One that the Qur’an amplified numerously: It does not require a majority to prevail, but rather a profoundly faithful few, who are keen to uphold the truth and sacrifice for it.To be the example of a candle that burns itself illuminating the way for others, to give the ultimate sacrifice to enlighten the path of the truth, as the truth and only the truth shall set you free.

In a very famous Hadith, the Beloved Prophet, sallallahu alayhi wa aalihi wa sallam, says: “Husayn is from me and I am from Husayn”. The meaning entailed by this Hadith is not that I am Husayn’s grandfather, as this is an obvious fact. The meaning sheds light that Husayn is like me, Husayn’s line is similar to my line, Husayn’s message is my message, Husayn is from me and I am from Husayn.

The Ayahs and Ahadith about Ahl ul Bayt al-Athar including their Master Al-Imam Al-Husayn are numerous, that most of you know.
We are already in Muharram, and in a few days, the day of Ashura comes. A day where the Beloved of the Beloved demonstrated the highest of nobility, and offered the ultimate of sacrifices. It is no wonder, knowing that he is the grandsone of our Beloved Holy Prophet, the son of Amirul-Muminin Ali, brother of Al-Imam Al-Hasan, and a beloved son to Master, the Lady of Ahl ul Jannah Sayyidatina wa Mawlatuna Fatimah-Azzahra, sallallahu ala sayyidina Muhammad wa aalihi wa sallam.

There was a noble reason that demanded the martyrdom of Imam Husayn. The simple and obvious reason is simply to preserve Islam. Islam, Haqq, Truth, Justice, Equality, Freedom and Liberty are all precious values that demanded precious sacrifice. That, to my mind, is the supreme significance of martyrdom. But the highest honour must still lie with the symbol, who faced fearful odds and refused to surrender to evil. Rather than allow a stigma to attach to sacred things, they paid with their own lives the penalty of honour and Haqq. The begining of the batter offered by our beloved Imam Husayn was when he went from city to city, hunted about from place to place, but making no compromise with evil. Then was offered the choice of an effectual but dangerous attempt at clearing the house of God, or living at ease for himself while closing an eye on the ongoing destruction of Islam and its values. He chose the path of danger and hardships with duty and honour, and never swerved from it giving up his life freely in the absolute bravest of ways ever known to Mankind.

That briefly is the story. What is the lesson? There is ofcourse the physical suffering in martyrdom, and all sorrow and suffering claim our sympathy, —- the dearest, nearest, purest, closest to our hearts, souls and minds. The one who the Beloved Holy Prophet, sallallahu alayhi wa aalihi wa sallam, himself used to interrupt his speeches to pick him up, delay his prostration to honour and not bother him, the one whose face not only is honourable, but it is the face where The Holy Prophet’s honorable lips, face, and body touched, loved, and valued. It is that very same honorable face, that Yazid bin Mu’awiyah ibn Abi Sufyaan al-Ummayadi humiliated, slaughtered, put on the spears, and kicked…….. There are no words that can describe the pain profoundly felt in every Free Human’s mind, soul, and heart.

But there is a greater suffering than physical suffering. That is when a valiant soul seems to stand against the world; when the noblest motives of Islam are reviled and mocked; when truth seems to suffer an eclipse. It may even seem that the martyr has but to say a word of compliance, do a little deed of non-resistance; and much sorrow and suffering would be saved; and the insidious whisper comes:
“Truth after all will never die”
But the whole battle is for man’s keeping hold of Haqq and Freedom. And that can only be done by the highest examples of man’s conduct - spiritual striving and suffering enduring firmness of faith and purpose, patience and courage where ordinary mortals would give in or be cowed down, the sacrifice of ordinary motives to supreme truth in scorn of consequence.

The martyr bears witness, and the witness redeems what would otherwise be called failure. It so happened with Al-Imam Al-Husayn, the Master of the youth of Ahlul Jannah. For all were touched by the story of his martyrdom, and it gave the deathblow to the tyrant politics of Yazid bin Mu’awiyah ibn Abi Sufyaan al-Ummayadi and all the oppression it stood for. And Imam Al-Husayn being alive, more alive than ever, not only externally but living profoundly deep in our hearts, in our souls, and in our minds, has still the power to ignite the light of truth in the heart of all free, to send a message to the courageous not to bow down to evil, and to teach people not to surrender to tyranny.

There are those who until today believe that forgeries, fancy words, and booklets can mask the shining truth. Persistent attempts to distance Al-Imam Al-Husayn and his Sirah away from Ahlus Sunnah are ongoing, and more intense, and serious than ever. This Yazidi line, regardless of what banner or name they choose to brand themselves with, can no longer fool the intellectual Muslim. Their scare tactics, labeling, and “intellectual terrorism” are weapons of the past, and no longer effective for those who see. While we must pray for their guidance, we shall never fall as victims to their misguidance.

In the upcoming very sad days in our lives, and the life of every free human being, I urge myself and you To:

1. Express sadness and show sorrow for the massacre of the dearest and purest of the Family of the Beloved Prophet, sallallahu alayhi wa aalih wa sallam. It is customary to many families of Ahlul bayt to show sadness during this month.
2. Expressing sorrow should be manifested by sincere intentions of repentance, and believing that if you were with them, you would have been on the side of Imam Husayn, even if it costs you any and everything.
3. Increasing the recitation of Qur’an, and try to teach your fellow family, friends, and non-Muslims about the revolution of Imam Husayn.
4. Increase your Istigfaar per day, and increase your Durud on the Beloved Prophet, sallallahu alayhi wa aalihi wa sallam.
5. Learn the Sirah of Imam Husayn, try to benefit from it, love it, live it.
6. Be generous to your family: bring them water ( and remember on this day Yazid’s army prevented Imam Husayn from drinking water), bring them food and remember the things that happened.
7. Be thankful to Allah, and ask Him to gather you with the supporters of Imam Husayn in this Dunya, and with his supporters and companions in the Akhira.
8. Be on the Haqq. Just, Freedom side,and check yourself.
9. Make the month of Muharram a month of Al-Husayn in your life, in a step to eventually make every month a month of Al-Husayn, Grandfather of Al-Husayn, Father of Al-Husayn, Mother of Al-Husayn, Brother of Al-Husayn, and those who love and follow Al-Husayn.
10. This is your chance to abandon the rest and follow the best. This is your chance to connect with Al-Imam Al-Husayn. Take time, purify your heart and connect.

His story purifies our emotions. We can best honour his memory by allowing it to teach us courage and constancy.
The sacrifice of Imam Husayn comes after the Sacrifice of his father, Sayyiduna Amirul’Muminin wa Imam al-Mutaqqeen Ali bin Abi Taleb al-Hashimi, and the sacrifice of Imam Hasan, and the line of sacrifice and martyrs among Ahlul Bayt is still a line enlightening the way for generations to come. They are like stars; you will not succeed in reaching them with your hands. But like the seafaring man on the desert of waters, you choose them as your guides, and following them you will reach your destiny.

Al-Imam Al-Husayn’s message was simple and clear: Is life so dear or so sweet as to be purchased at the price of chains and slavery? Forbid it, Almighty Allah! I know not what course others may take, but as for me, give me Haqq, or give me death!

“It is better to die on your feet than to live on your knees”

Wassalamu Alaykum,
Muhammad Bin Yahya Bin Muhammad Al-Ninowy

SOURCE: http://www.israinternational.com/knowledge/143-on-the-sacrifice-of-imam-husayn-raa.html

Shaykh G F Haddad writes:

AL-HUSAYN IBN `ALI - ALLAH BE WELL-PLEASED WITH HIM

Al-Hâkim and al-Bayhaqî narrated from Umm al-Fad.l bint al-Hârith (? who said: "I went in to see the Prophet one day, carrying al-Husayn, whom I placed in his lap. Then when I turned to look at him again, lo! I saw the eyes of the Messenger of Allâh brimming with tears. He said: 'Gibrîl just came and told me that my Community would kill this son of mine, and he brought me a handful of his resting-ground - red earth.'"41

Ibn Râhûyah, al-Bayhaqî, and Abû Nu`aym narrated from Umm Salama - Allâh be well-pleased with her that the Messenger of Allâh lay down one day and woke up sluggish, holding a handful of read earth in his hand and turning it this way and that I said: "What is this earth, O Messenger of Allâh?" He replied: "Gibrîl informed me that this one - meaning al-Husayn - would be killed in the land of Iraq, and this is his resting-ground."42

Abû Nu`aym narrated from Umm Salama (ra) who said: "Al-Hasan and al-Husayn were playing in my house when Gibrîl descended and said, 'O Muhammad, verily your Community shall kill this son of yours,' signaling to al-Husayn and bringing him [some of] his resting-ground; he smelled it and said, 'It smells of hardship (karb) and affliction (balâ').' Then he said, 'If this soil turns to blood, know that my son has been killed.' So I kept it in a jar."43

Ibn `Asâkir narrated from Muhammad ibn `Amr44 ibn Hasan who said: "We were with al-Husayn at the river of Karbalâ'45 when he looked at Shimr ibn Dhî al-Jawshan and said, 'Allâh and His Messenger were right! The Messenger of Allâh said: "I can see a spotted dog drooling over the blood of the people of my House."' Shimr was a leper."46

Ibn al-Sakan, al-Baghawî, and Abû Nu`aym narrated from Anas ibn al-Hârith who said, "I heard the Messenger of Allâh say: 'Truly this son of mine' - meaning al-Husayn - shall be killed in a land called Karbalâ'. Whoever among you is present then, help him!' Hence, Anas ibn al-Hârith went to Karbalâ' and was killed there with al-Husayn."47

Al-Tabarânî narrated from `A'isha - Allâh be well-pleased with her that the Prophet said: "Gibrîl told me that my son, al-Husayn, would be killed after me in the land of al-Taff [between Syria and Iraq], and he brought me this earth and told me that in it would be his resting-place."48 Ahmad and Ibn Sa`d narrated it from `Alî in the wording: "We feel he shall be killed on the shore of the Euphrates."49

Al-Baghawî narrated in his Mu`jam as reported from Anas ibn Mâlik who said: "The Angel of rain asked permission of his Lord to visit the Prophet and he obtained it. He came to visit him during the day he usually spent with Umm Salama. The Prophet said: "Umm Salama, keep the door closed and let no-one disturb us." As she reached the door, al-Husayn darted in and ran to the Prophet who began to hugh him and kiss him. The angel said to him, "Do you love him?" He said yes. The angel continued: "Truly, your Community shall kill him and, if you wish, I shall show you the place where he shall be killed." He showed it to him and brought him some reddish earth [from it], which Umm Salama took and put in her robe. Thâbit al-Bunânî - its narrator from Anas - said: "We considered that it was Karbalâ'."50

In the narration of Mullâ al-Mawsilî Umm Salama says, "The Prophet handed me a handful of red earth, saying: 'This is from the ground on which he [al-Husayn] shall be killed. When it turns to blood, know that he has been killed.'" Umm Salama said that she placed it "in a jar that I had, and I used to apprehend the terrible day when it would turn to blood."51 Al-Husayn was martyred as he had said, in Karbalâ', in Iraq, near al-Kûfa, in a place also known as al-Taff. This hadîth contains another stunning miracle of his , namely, the disclosure that Umm Salama would live beyond the time when al-Husayn would be killed, as took place.

Wa Sallallahu `ala Sayyidina Muhammadin wa Alihi wa Sallama Taslima

FOOTNOTES

41 Narrated from Umm al-Fadl by al-Hâkim (3:176-177=1990 ed 3:194) who said it is sound by the criteria of al-Bukhârî and Muslim but al-Dhahabî said: "Rather, it is da`îf munqati`, Shaddâd did not meet Umm al-Fadl while Muhammad ibn Mus`ab [al-Qirqisânî] is weak." However, al-Dhahabî cited a similar report in the Siyar (al-Arna'ût ed 3:289) and said its chain was fair.

42 Narrated from Umm Salama by Ibn Abî `Asim in al-Ahâd wa al-Mathânî (1:310 #429), al-Tabarânî in al-Kabîr (3:109, 23:308), and al-Hâkim (1990 ed 4:440) with a fair chain because of Mûsâ ibn Ya`qûb al-Zam`î; and from `A'isha by al-Tabarânî in al-Kabîr (3:107 #2815). Also narrated from "`A'isha or Umm Salama" by Ahmad in the Musnad and Fadâ'il al-Sahâba but with a very weak chain.

43 Narrated by al-Tabarânî in al-Kabîr (3:108 #2817), al-Mizzî in Tahdhîb al-Kamâl (6:409), and Ibn Hajar in Tahdhîb al-Tahdhîb (2:300-301) through the Râfidî `Amr ibn Thâbit ibn Hurmuz al-Bakrî who is weak or discarded Cf. al-Haythamî (9:189).

44 `Umar in al-Nabahânî's text, corrected from Târîkh Dimashq and Kanz al-`Ummâl.

45 Twenty-four miles North-West of al-Kûfa.

46 Narrated by Ibn `Asâkir in Târîkh Dimashq (23:190), cf. Kanz (#37717) and al-Bidâya.

47 Narrated from Suhaym, from Anas ibn Mâlik by Abû Nu`aym in the Dalâ'il (p. 554 #493) and al-Baghawî and Ibn al-Sakan in their Companion-compendiums. Cf. Ibn Hajar, Isâba (1:121); al-Bukhârî, al-Târîkh al-Kabîr (2:30 #1583); al-Istî`âb (1:112); al-Khasâ'is al-Kubrâ (2:451).

48 Narrated from `A'isha by al-Tabarânî in al-Kabîr (3:107 #2814) and al-Awsat (6:249 #6316) with weak chains per al-Haythamî (8:288, 9:188), cf. al-Suyûtî, Ziyâdat al-Jâmi` al-Saghîr (#147) and Kanz (#34299). It is overall fair since it and Umm Salama's narration are mutually reinforced

49 Narrated from `Alî by Ahmad, Abû Ya`lâ (#363), Ibn Abî `Asim in al-Ahâd wa al-Mathânî (1:308 #427), Ibn Abî Shayba (7:487 #37367), al-Bazzâr (3:101 #884), al-Tabarânî in al-Kabîr (3:105 #2811), al-Mizzî in Tahdhîb al-Kamâl (6:407), and Ibn Hajar in Tahdhîb al-Tahdhîb (2:300), all with a weak chain - because of `Abd Allâh ibn Nujayy al-Hadramî and his father - as per al-Arna'ût in the Musnad (2:77-78 #648) and al-Munâwî (1:204-205) as opposed to al-Haythamî (9:187) and al-Maqdisî in al-Mukhtâra (2:375 #758) while al-Dhahabî adduces a second weak chain that reinforces the first This report contains `Alî's call to his son in absentia, "Sabran Abâ `Abd Allâh!" Cf. Ibn Taymiyya, Minhâj (Qurtuba ed 3:367-368) and al-Dhahabî, Siyar (Risala ed 3:288=Fikr ed 4:407-408).

50 Narrated from Anas by Ahmad, Abû Ya`lâ (6:129 #3402), al-Bazzâr (#2642), al-Tabarânî in al-Kabîr (3:106 #2813), Ibn Hibbân (15:142 #6742 hadîth hasan), Abû Nu`aym in the Dalâ'il (p. 553 #492), al-Bayhaqî in the Dalâ'il (6:469), and al-Mizzî in Tahdhîb al-Kamâl (6:408) cf. Kanz (#37672), al-Haythamî (9:187-190), al-Dhahabî, Siyar (3:288-289=Fikr ed 4:408), and al-Suyûtî's Khasâ'is (2:450).

51 Narrated by al-Tabarânî in al-Kabîr (3:108 #2817), al-Mizzî in Tahdhîb al-Kamâl (6:409), and Ibn Hajar in Tahdhîb al-Tahdhîb (2:300-301) through the Râfidî `Amr ibn Thâbit ibn Hurmuz al-Bakrî who is weak or discarded. Cf. al-Haythamî (9:189).

SOURCE: http://livingislam.org/n/pku_e.html.

Nasibies are doing non stop propaganda that People of Kufa (i.e. Shias) were disloyal to Hussain and Hussain was killed due to them (This is a false accusation upon Shias and please read the reality in this Article).

It is time to show Nasibies the Mirror.

Betrayal of Sahaba of Madina: They were Disloyal & Coward (i.e. Nasibi Taqayyah) & Killers of Uthman

If Uthman was on Haq (right path), then there is no more Disloyalty & Cowardice that he was killed in the presence of thousands of Sahaba & Tabaeen of Madina.

Now Nasibies are welcome to comment upon the Bravery & Loyalty of these thousands of Sahaba & Tabaeen of Madina.

[Note: For us, Uthman was absolutely not on right path, and it were these Sahaba & Tabaeen themselves who killed Uthman. But Nasibies don't accept it, so let them answer how then Uthman was murdered in presence of thousands of these Sahaba & Tabaeen of Madina.]

Uthman's Dead Body was left to rot for 3 days before buried in Jewish Graveyard

Nasibies claim that Sahaba & Tabaeen of Madina were loyal to Uthman.

But it is enough to see how Uthman was left to rot by these Sahaba & Tabaeen in order to refute the Nasibi claim.

We are presenting all of the following Traditions from "History of Tabari" (Enlish Edition, Volume 15, Incidents of Year 35 Hijri), translated by Stephen Humphreys (University of Winsconsin, Madison), published by State University of New York Press.

Image: Cover Page of Book
Image: Page 246
Image: Page 247
Image: Page 248
Image: Page 249

These same traditions have also been mentioned by Ibn Kathir in his Al-badaya wa Al-Nahaya.

First Tradition

(Page 246)

It was related to me by ]a'far b. 'Abdallah al-Muharnmadi—'Amr b. Hammad and 'Ali b. Husayn-Husayn b. ‘lsa—his father-—Abu
Maymunah—Abu Bashir al-'Abidi:
'Uthman’s corpse} was thrown aside and left unburied for three days. Then Hakim bin Hizam al-Qurashi, who was a member of the clan of Asad b. ‘Abd al-'Uzza, and Jubayr b. Mut'im b. 'Adi b. Nawfal b. ‘Abd Manaf spoke to 'Ali about his burial, seeking his permission for ['Uthman’s) family to see to that. 'Ali granted them his permis-sion but when news of this spread people lay in wait for ['Uthman’s body] by the road, armed with stones. A few members of his family set out with |his body], intending to take him to an enclosure in Medina named Hashsh Kawkab, where the Jews used
to bury their dead. Now when ['Uthman's body] was brought out before the people, they stoned his bier and were bent on throwing him to the ground. When 'Ali hear that, he sent and demanded that they leave him alone. They did so, and ['Uthman’s body] was hurried along and interred in Hashsh Kawkab. When Mu‘awiyah b. Abi Sufyan gained supremacy over the Muslims (al-nas], he ordered that enclosure to be razed and transferred [‘Uthman’s body to al-Baqi'. Then he commanded the people to bury their dead around his grave, until ultimately (those graves] adjoined the cemetery of the Muslims.

Questions to Nasibies:

Ali, Talha, Zubair, Saad bin Abi Waqqas, Imam Hassan, Imam Hussain,........ and a lot of other Sahaba hundreds of other Tabaeen were present in Madiana and it's surroundings.
Tell us, what were they doing FOR THE COMPLETE 3 DAYS (i.e. Uthman's funeral was not burried for complete 3 days)?
People stoned the body of Hadhrat Uthman, broke his ribs, didn't let him washed (for burrial), didn't offered his funeral prayer (except for 5-6 of his relatives/slaves),..... could Nasibies tell us what those thousands of Sahaba and Taba'een of Madina did in order to protect Uthman?

Second Tradition:

Page 247
It was related to me by Ja'far—'Amr and ‘Ali—Husayn—his father—al-Mujalid b. Sa'id —Yasaar b. Abi Karib—his father Abu Karib, who had been an official in charge of ‘Uthman's treasury:

'Uthman was buried at twilight. Only Marwan b. al-Hakam, three of his free men, an his fifth daughter were present at his funeral. His daughter wailed in mourning and raised Her voice in lament for him. The people took stones and hooted "Long-bearded old idiot [i.e. Nathal]! She was nearly stoned. Then they said, "(Go to] the compotmd, the compound." And thus he was interred in a compound outside [Medina].

Comments:

It was 'Aisha bit Abi Bakr (the Mother of Believers) who started saying "Nathal" (old fool) to 'Uthman bin 'Affan. And these People, who are stoning/dragging Uthman's dead body, they are only following 'Aisha bint Abi Bakr. Therefore, 'Uthman was killed in fire which was ignited by 'Aisha bint Abi Bakr.

Third Tradition:

Page 248
According to Muhammad (al-Waqidi}—‘Abdallah b. Yazid al-Hudhali—'Abdallah b. Sa‘idah:

For two nights after he was killed, 'Uthman remained [where he had fallen] and they were unable to bury him. Then four men bore [his body] away-——Hakim b. Hizam, Jubayr b. Mut‘im, Niyar b. Mukram, and Abu Jahm b. Hudhayfah. When he was laid down so that the funeral prayer could be per-
formed for him, a band of the Helpers (Ansaar of Madina i.e. Sahaba and Tabaeen) came and forbade them to perform the prayer. These included
Aslam b. Aws b. Bajrah al-Saa'idi and Abu Hayyah al-Mazini among several others. They forbade (‘Uthman's supporters) to bury him at al-Baqi‘....
So they buried him in Hashsh Kawkab. When the Banu Umayyah reigned, they had that garden included in al-Baqi', and it is today the cemetery of the Banu Umayyah.

Comments:

Just see it were HELPERS (i.e. Residents of Madina), who consisted of Sahaba as well as Taba'een who forbade them to offer Funeral Prayer at that place.
And then these were the same Ansaar Sahaba and Taba'een who forbade that 'Uthman is burried in Muslim Graveyard.
And due to them 'Uthman was not even burried in Muslim Graveyard but in Jewish Graveyard.

Question for Nasibies is to tell us where were their Super Man like Hero Sahabas and Tabaeen from Madina and all the surroundings while 'Uthman's dead body left unburried for complete 3 days?

Fourth Tradition

Page 248
According to Muhammad (al-Waqidi)—‘Abdallah b. Musa al-Makhzumi:

When 'Uthman was killed, (his assassins) tried to cut off his head, but Na'ilah and Umm al-Banin fell upon him and stopped them. The two women screamed and beat [their] faces and rent their clothing. In the face of this, Ibn 'Udays said, "Leave him." And thus 'Uthman, his corpse still unwashed, was taken out and brougt to al-Baqi'. [The mourners] wanted to perform the funeral prayer for him in the place set aside for funerals, but the Helpers (Ansaar i.e. Sahaba and Tabaeen) refused (to allow that). 'Umayr bin Dhabi' appeared while 'Uthman was stretched out upon a door. 'Umayr jumped 0n him and broke one of his ribs, saying, “You left Dhabi’ in prison until he died there."

Fifth Tradition

Page 249
It was related to me by al-Harith—Ibn Sa°d—Abu Bakr b. ‘Abdallah b. Abi Uways—his grandfather’s paternal uncle, al-Rabi‘ b. Malik b. Abi 'Amir—(Al-Rabi's) father:

I was one 0f 'Uthmarfs pallbearers when he was killed. We carried him upon a door, and his head was bumping up and down on the door because
we were walking so fast. We wer possessed with fear until we interred him in his grave in Hashsh Kawkab.

Sixth Tradition:

We are citing from the following esteemed Sunni works:
1. Majma al-Zawaed, by Haythami, Volume 9, page 95
2. Al-Muj'am al-Kabir by Tabarani, Volume 1, page 79
3. Al-Istiab, by Ibn Abdulbar, Volume 3, page 1048

We read in Majma al-Zawaid:

وعن ملك يعني ابن انس قال قتل عثمان فأقام مطروحا على كناسة بني فلان ثلاثا

Malik bin Anas said: When Uthman was killed, his body was thrown in garbage for three days.

Imam Abi Bakar Al-Haythami said:‘The narrators are reliable’.

Moreover we read in Al-Istiab:

عن مالك قال لما قتل عثمان رضي الله عنه ألقى على المزبلة ثلاثة أيام

Malik said: ‘When Uthman [ra] was killed, they threw him in the garbage for three days’

How many Sahaba & Tabaeen offered Funeral Prayer for 'Uthman?

There were thausands of Sahaba & Tabaeen in Madina.

But at end, there were only 5 people from Bani Ummiyyah who offered funeral prayer (proofs are present in traditions above).

If really all the Sahaba & Tabaeen were in favour of 'Uthman, then not attending his funeral was the beginning of their cowardice (in Nasibies terminology "Taqqyyah") .... and the PEAK of their Cowardice/Disloyalty & Munafiqat (hypocracy) was when Talha & Zubair swore in name of Allah and gave oath of allegiance to 'Ali .... but as soon as they got the chance, they RAN away to Mecca and broke their allegiance.

Maulana Tariq Jameel describing about the oppression done on Imam Hussain and His greatness and Crying while talking about the Mazloomiat of Imam Husain.

He further said that we should be the follower of Imam Hussain and not of the accursed Yazid.

Where is Zakir Naik? Where is the accursed person? See Zakir Naik, open your ears, and look at your ignorance ... and look at the words of Maulana Tariq Jameel

The 90-minute film records pilgrims' decisions, Ashura itself and the intense emotions of the Shia mourning of Hussain's death. It includes footage of the bombings and their aftermath.

Assalam o Alikum

Agar humaray upper kufr k fatway lagtay hain, hamain Kafir kaha jata hai, tou humay chahyay un asbaab ki taraf b mutawajah rahain.

is topic ki ahmiyat is tarah bayan ki ja sakti hai k Mazhab e Tashayyu Dushman daar mazhab hai, Maslan agar koi fard Dushman daar ho tou wo apnay dushman se mohtaat rehta hai, aik lahzay k liay b apnay Dushman se gafil nahi rehta, kiun k gaflat ka nateeja halakat hai..

Lihaza agar hum apnay Dushman se gafil rahain tou humain hargiz yay gumaan nahi karna chahyay k humara Dushman b hum se Gafil ho gaya hai..

Humaray Dushman ki pahlay din se koshish rahi k humay Sunni Shia may taqseem kar dain, Shia or Sunni har do taraf is tarah k grouh ijaad kiyay jo aik dosray per kufr k fatway lagain, inho nay aisa mahool bana deya k aj Shia ka dushman Sunni, or Sunni ka sab se bara dushman Shia ha,

humaray buzurg batatay hain (Mumkin ha is forum per bhi mojood hon ) k aj se 30, 35 saal pahlay azadari may sab shareek hotay thay, Shia or Sunni aik sath jaloos e aza may shareek hotay thay, in ki sabeel hotee the, nazr o niyaaz sath mil kar kartay thay, baaz okaat nishan dahi karna b mushkil hota tha k kon shia ha or kon sunni, Hatta k aj b baaz ziyarat or Majalis k permit or license b Ahle Sunnat bradraan k zimaydaro k naam se mojood hain (Ref: Speech of Syed Jawad)

Akhir yay dushmania kiun barhnay lagi ?

Shia't k ander Nuseri circles nay shamoliat ikhtiyaar ki, or is tarah ghul mil gae jaisay aqaid may koi faraq he na ho, ahista ahista in ki rasai minber tuk honay lagi, or inho nay apnay paleed afkaar bari maharat se humaray minber tuk pohchae, aj hum Mushahida kar saktay hain k Imam Ali a.s k fazail bayan kartay huay jo baaz dostaan nadani may hadain paar kar jatay hain, yay sab ittefaqan aisay nahi hua hai, yay in ki kai sala mehnat hai jo apnay samar dekha rahi hai,

Shia't k ander he aik or grouh ejaad hua jis ka kaam joloos may theek Ahlesunnat ki masajid k bahir ja kar Hazrat Umer, or Abu Bakar per or Bibi Ayesha per tabara karna or galian deyna tha ( Jo k islami taleemat k lihaaz se kabi b jaiz nahi )
Baqaida Tabbara road banaye gae, print media, websites, youtube, hatta k minber istimaal huay, baaz ilaqay may ahlesunnat ki aqsariat honay k bawajood yay amul majlis k doraan kiyay gae, or zulm bala zulm yay k fitnay ko ibadat samjh kar anjaam deya jata raha. (Fee sabeel illlahh Fasaad)
*************************************

is k bar'aks ahleSunnat musalmaano k ander aik grouh ijaad kia gaya jo aqaid k lihaaz se khawarij se kum nahi thay, Saudi paisa or Zia ul Huq k support se inho nay maderso or masajid ko istimaal kartay huay Shia k barhtay huay Asr o Rasookh ko kum karnay k liay kaam shoro kia.. or fatwoo ki factories laga dein..
Jaisa k pahlay tazkira hua k Nuserio nay Shia't k ander apnay qadam jamana shoro kiyay, or Mushrikana Nazryaat ka parchaar kia, is fitnay se in Khawarij numa Nasibio nay bharpoor faida uthaya.. Shia per Shirk or Kufr k fatway lagae, Amm faham sunni ko shia k khilaaf khara kar deya, zahir ha in k paas shia ko badnaam karnay k liay buhat acha bahana tha,

Inho nay Kaha shia mushrik hain wo Hazrat Ali r.a k sath aise sifaat shamil kartay hain jo Allah se Makhsoos hai
Wo Sahaba or Bibi Ayesha ko khulay Aam galian deytay hian
Wo Namaz e Juma or jama't k qail nahi
Wo zuljana ko sajday kartay hain
or is k ilawa ajeeb o gareeb qisam k propaganda huay

Lihaza Saudi paisa apna kaam dekha gaya, aj ap survey kar lain k sab se ziada propaganda pori duniya may kis k khilaaf hua hai? Yahee waja hai k aj Tashayyu k sab se ziada dushman hai.

عاشورا کے خون بار واقعے سے تقریبا 14 صدیاں گذرنے کے باوجود، یا زخم ابھی آسمان و زمین میں تازہ کائنات پوری عزادار ہے سیدالشہداء امام حسین علیہ السلام کی۔
تازہ ترین عاشورائی واقعے میں اتوار 10 محرم الحرام 1434 (26/نومبر 2012) کو عاشورائے اباعبداللہ علیہ السلام کے موقع پر سیدالشہداء علیہ السلام کے میوزیم میں رکھی ہوئی قبر شریف امام حسین (ع) کی اصل تربت کا رنگ خون میں بدل گیا۔
یہ واقعہ عینی شاہدین کی حیرت زدہ آنکھوں کے سامنے اور عاشورائے حسینی کے موقع پر رونما ہوا اور میوزیم کے اہلکاروں نے اس واقعے کی تصدیق کی ہے اور اس واقعے کی تصویریں آستانۂ مقدسۂ حضرت علمدار کربلا ابوالفضل العباس علیہ السلام سے ویب سائٹ "الکفیل" نے شائع کی ہیں۔
نیز آیت اللہ العظمی سیستانی کے نمائندے اور آستانۂ امام حسین علیہ السلام کے متولی حجت الاسلام والمسلمین شیخ عبدالمہدی الکربلائی نے ذاتی طور پر میوزیم میں جاکر اس واقعے کا مشاہدہ کیا اور ہزاروں افراد نے میوزیم کا دورہ کیا۔

شیعہ اور سنی کتب میں منقولہ معتبر احادیث میں مروی ہے کہ جبرائیل امین (ع) نے کربلا کی خاک میں سے تھوڑی سی مٹی امام حسین علیہ السلام کی شہادت کی خبر کے ساتھ ہی رسول اکرم صلی اللہ علیہ و آلہ و سلم کے سپرد کی اور رسول اکرم (ص) نے وہ مٹی ام المؤمنین امّ سلمہ کے پاس رکھ لی اور فرمایا: "جب اس مٹی کا رنگ خون کے رنگ میں بدل جائے تو سمجھ لینا کہ میرے فرزند حسین (علیہ السلام) کربلا کی سرزمین پر قتل ہوئے ہیں"۔
حدیث کا متن یہ ہے: عن عمر بن ثابت عن الاعمش عن شقيق عن امّ سلمة قالت: كان الحسن والحسين (عليهما السلام) يلعبان بين يدي رسول اللّه (صلى الله عليه وآله) في بيتي؛ فنزل جبریل فقال: "يا محمّد إن امتك تقتل ابنك هذا من بعدك" و أومأ بيده إلى الحسين(ع). فبكى رسول اللّه (صلى الله عليه وآله) وضمّه إلى صدره ثم قال رسول اللّه(ص): "وضعت عندك هذه التربة" فشمّها رسول اللّه (ص) قال: ريح كرب و بلاء، و قال: "يا ام سلمة إذا تحولت هذه التربة دماً فاعلمي أن ابني قد قتل
".
ترجمه: عمر بن ثابت نے اعمش سے اور اعمش نے شقیق سے روایت کی ہے کہ جناب ام سلمہ نے کہا: ایک دن حسن اور حسین علیہما السلام میرے گھر میں رسول اللہ صلی اللہ علیہ و آلہ و سلم کے سامنے کھیل رہے تھے کہ اسی وقت جبرائیل (ع) نازل ہوئے اور رسول اللہ (ص) سے عرض کیا: آپ کے بعد آپ کی امت آپ کے اس بیٹے کو قتل کرے گی اور امام حسین علیہ السلام کی طرف ہاتھ سے اشارہ کیا۔ رسول اللہ (ص) روئے اور امام حسین (ع) کو اپنے سینے سے لگایا۔ اس کے بعد رسول اللہ (ص) نے جبرائیل کی دی ہوئی مٹی کو سونگھا اور فرمایا "اس سے کرب و بلاء کی بو آرہی ہے۔ اور مجھ سے مخاطب ہوکر فرمایا: اے ام سلمہ! میں یہ مٹی تمہارے پاس رکھتا ہوں اور جب یہ خون میں بدل جائے تو جان لو کہ میرے بیٹے حسین قتل کئے گئے ہیں۔
سنی محدثین ـ جنہوں نے یہ حدیث نقل کی ہے ـ میں سے بعض کے نام درج ذیل ہیں:
ابن حجر عسقلانی، "تہذيب الہذیب"،
ابن ابی بکر ہیثمی، "مجمع الزوائد"
الطبرانی، "المعجم الکبیر"

by

Ali Jaffri

In Surat Saafaat: 101-109, Allah says:
We gave him (Hazrat Ibraheem A.S) the tidings of a son possessing forbearance (hilm).
And when the son (Hazrat Ismail A.S) was old enough to walk about with him (some mufassireen have translated sa'ya as to work) (Ibraheem) said: “O my son I have a seen in a dream that I should sacrifice you (for the pleasure of Allah)". He (the son) responded: O my father! Do what you are commanded. If Allah pleases, you will find me of the patient ones."
So when they had both submitted (to Allah), he (Ibraheem) flung him (his son) down upon his face.
We called out to him saying: "O Ibraheem!
You have indeed fulfilled the vision. Surely thus do We reward those who do good deeds
Most surely that was tremendous (manifest) trial!”*
Then We ransomed him (Ismail) with a great sacrifice (bidhibhin 'azeem).
And we shifted (this blessing) on him (who is from) among the generations (to come) in later times.
Peace be upon Ibraheem!
The above verse paints the picture of a father and son. The father was commanded by Allah to sacrifice his beloved son. The son willingly accepted to be the sacrifice for the pleasure of Allah. By Allah's Grace the son is saved. Allah says the dhibhin 'azeem will come from the later generations. This was a test of obedience to Allah's command. Ibraheem dearly loved Ismail, but he loved Allah more. He agrees to sacrifice his son for the pleasure of Allah. Ismail is a youth with a whole life time ahead of him. Yet not only he agrees to be the sacrifice but also assures his father that he will, inshallah, find him amongst the patient one.
The most poignant statement is that of Allah when He says it was indeed a tremendous trial for the father and the son!
To perpetuate the memory of this test we perform pilgrimage where every ritual is connected with the love which a father and a mother have for their child. Sa'ee reminds us of infant Ismail's thirst and a mother's frantic search for water to quench the baby's thirst. The journey to Mena with a halt at Arafah retraces the journey undertaken by the father and son to fulfill Allah's command.
Where are there any circumstances to call for such a sacrifice? One can find no reference to it. Was it recorded by any historian? No, Allah recorded it and reminds the Muslims of the events year after year during the pilgrimage.
Over three thousand years later, on the 10th of Muharram in 61 Hijrah, history witnessed the situation re-enacted on the battle-field of Karbala. Then a sacrifice was called for to protect and save Islam and all its values from being trampled under the unclean feet of Yazid. Wahdaniyyah was at stake! Prophet hood was at stake! Justice was at stake! The belief of accountability on the Day of Judgement was at stake!

Miles away from Mecca we once again we see a father and a son. Ali Akbar is standing in front of Imam Hussein. He says, "Father, I request for permission to go and fight the enemies of Islam." Imam looks at his son lovingly. He says, "Akbar, you have my permission. May Allah be with you! But Akbar, you know how much your mother, sisters and aunts love you. Go and say farewell to them." Akbar goes into the tent of his mother. Every time he wants to come out of the tent the mother, aunts and sisters pull his cloak and say, "O Akbar, How can we live without you!"
Finally Imam Hussein goes in and pleads with all to let Ali Akbar go.
Imam helps his son mount the horse. As Akbar begins to ride towards the battlefield, he hears foot-steps coming from behind. He looks back and sees his father. He says, "Father, we have said good-bye, why are you walking behind me?" Hussein replies, "My son, had you been a father you would surely have understood how difficult it is for a father to part from his son!!"

After a fierce battle Akbar is over-powered by the enemy who rush from all sides. As he falls from his horse, he cries out. "O Father, my last salaams to you!" As he hits the ground a spear which had wounded him and lodged in his chest breaks. The blade remains embedded in Akbar’s chest.
When our Imam heard Akbar's salaam he looked at Furaat where Abbas lay and said, 'Abbas! Now that this brother of yours needs you most, where have you gone?' With all his strength sapped by the anguish in Akbar's voice, Hussein began to walk towards the battle-field.
When Imam Hussein got to where Akbar lay he took him in his arms. Akbar had his right hand on the chest. He placed his left arm over the shoulder of his father. Hussein said, "Akbar, why do you embrace me with one arm only?" Akbar would not reply. Hussein tried to move Akbar's hand. Akbar resisted. Imam gently moved the hand. Then he saw it! He saw that dreadful blade of spear sticking out of his son's chest. Imam Hussein laid Ali Akbar on the ground and sitting on his knees he put both his hands on the blade of the spear. He then looked at Najaf, and cried out, "Father, I too have come to my Khaiber!" He pulled out the blade.
Jibraeel (A.S) cried out "Marhaba! Marhaba!”* Akber took a deep sigh and then lay still!
Assalamu 'alaika ya waritha Ibraheema khaleelillah!

Hum Shias matam kyuon Karte Hain ??

Exrtacted from : http://agniveer.com

Infamous Zakir Naik -the Supporter of Yazeed (l.a.)

Finally, the efforts of Agniveer to combat anti-national terror forces have yielded results. After detailed analyses of evil designs of promoter(s) of the threatening Peace TV made public by Agniveer, it has finally been banned by Intelligence Bureau, Government of India. To broadcast this channel now or support anti-India propaganda is a criminal offence.

It was exactly three years ago when Agniveer spearheaded the intellectual crusade against open terrorism by radical Islamist Zakir Naik. As liberal and secular Indians, it was impossible for us to even imagine that, in India, someone can threaten apostates (those who change their religion) of death penalty or abuse gods and deities of other faiths or insult Prophet whom billions of devotees consider messenger of God. But all this happened and kept happening for years. A man called Zakir Naik continued to enjoy the freedom of speech regardless of blasphemous acts he committed against all religions and their founders.

Some 3 years ago, Agniveer received a message. It was sent by an IRF (Islamic Research Foundation, Zakir Naik’s organization) official. The person gave reference to one of our articles on Vedas and mocked our efforts of reviving Vedic faith. He wrote-

Your religion of Vedas will die soon. We are converting Indians @ millions per month and your people will not even realize when they would become minority in this land. In next five years, India will be a Wahabi majority country. (He actually wrote Muslim Majority country but Islam as per them is Wahabism alone and they consider other Muslims like Sufis, Barelvis, Deobandis, Ahmadis and Shias as Kafirs/infidels/Non-Muslims. On their Peace TV, they often appeal to destroy these infidels).

This IRF official further wrote-

Agniveer! Convert to Islam soon or else you have no future. We invite you to the Peace Conference in which Dr Zakir Naik will welcome you to Islam and accept you all as his team members on stage and you will be his allies in his Dawah project (conversion). But if you refuse there is darkness ahead.

Till that date we never took this man called Zakir Naik and his works seriously. But that day we realized the gravity of the matter. A man was openly challenging us of converting this whole nation into slaves of Arabs on our own forum in our own country! This was alarming. And that was the time when Agniveer decided to fight this fanatic tooth and nail and destroy his evil designs against our motherland and its habitants he had planned with millions of petrodollars and support from Middle East.

We researched on this man and his work and were shocked completely. We found this man more dangerous than Osama Bin Laden and Taliban for society, country and world. His speeches, writings and ideology were so dangerous that no sensible person would ever agree to. We will discuss few of them here one by one so that readers could imagine how grievous it is to let this man preach in civilized world

1. His hatred towards Prophet Muhammad, Founder of Islam

a. He claimed that Prophet was a demon

While he was pretending to be a devout Muslim and representative of the only right sect of Islam leading to heaven, his hatred towards Prophet Muhammad was exposed soon. Zakir Naik claimed that a character named Mahamada in Bhavishya Purana, the book of Hindus, who was incarnation of Demon Tripurasur and was termed as ‘Ghost’ and ‘Rascal’ is none other than Prophet Muhammad. He preached this lie day in and day out and tried to fool Muslims and Hindus for months together. Soon Agniveer gave a tight slap to this fanatic for his heinous attempt of denigrating Prophet. Agniveer established that Mahamada of Bhavishya Puran is not Prophet Muhammad. Kindly visit this to read further. Agniveer also warned Muslims that this man is the biggest enemy of Islam today and needs to be stopped.

b. He praised Yazeed and prayed for him despite that Yazeed was responsible for killing Prophet Muhammad’s grandson in battle of Karbala and the massacre afterwards that claimed thousands of lives and rapes.

c. His Peace TV scholars provoked people to attack celebrations of Prophet Muhammad’s Birthday

Israr Ahmed, Main Scholar, Peace TV says-

“Attack those people physically and verbally who celebrate Milad Un Nabi- Birthday of Prophet Muhammad (saw).. Only those will be true Muslims who will wage Jihad against celebration of Prophet’s Birthday.”

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aiOlUPicjb0

This is the interpretation of a tradition found in Sahih Bukhari (the most revered book by Sunni) Holy Prophet said : "There will be twelve Caliph after me."

Interpretation by Sunni Scholar

According to Qazi Ayaaz., the import of the Messenger of Allah (s.a.w.a.) through the tradition concerning twelve Imams (a.s.) was that the twelve Imams (a.s.) will exist only during the caliphs’ might, the strength of Islam and the steadfastness of its affairs. This occurred when consensus was found among the people on this issue till the decline of the Bani Umayyah when mischief arose amongst them in the reign of Waleed Ibn Yazid. Ibn Hajar, in his Fath al-Baari, has opted for this interpretation citing the tradition ‘All of them (caliphs) will be the unanimous choice of the people’ as evidence for the same. Thereafter, he proceeds to mention the names of the caliphs, who enjoyed the consensus of the people: Abu Bakr, Umar, Usman, Ali (a.s.), Muawiyyah, Yazid, Abd al-Malik and his four sons, Waleed, Sulaiman, Yazid and Heshaam.

He says, ‘Umar Ibn Abd al-Aziz interrupted the chain between Sulaiman and Yazid. These are the seven after the four rightly-guided caliphs and when Umar Ibn Abd al-Aziz is not counted amongst them. The twelfth of them is Walid Ibn Yazid Ibn Abd al-Malik.

Our Reply: This is the worst possible and most insulting interpretation of the Prophetic tradition, even if Ibn Hajar says that it is the most preferable of all interpretations. We will not argue about the antecedents of the Bani Umayyah and the incorrectness of attributing them to be from the Quraysh, as these traditions announce explicitly that the twelve Imams (a.s.) will be from the Quraysh.

Muawiyyah Ibn Abi Sufyan

How on earth can such tidings, which were announced as glorification of the twelve caliphs, be applicable for Muawiyyah’s caliphate? For, he is the one who

- Fought with Ameerul Momineen Ali Ibn Abi Taalib (a.s.), about whom the Messenger of Allah (s.a.w.a.) declared, ‘War against you (O Ali) is war against me’
- Organized speeches abusing Ameerul Momineen (a.s.) from the pulpits and,
- Poisoned to death Imam Hasan al-Mujtaba (a.s.), the chief of the youth of Paradise.

Yazid Ibn Muawiyyah

How on earth can these traditions apply for a beast like Yazid Ibn Muawiyyah, who

Fought against and mercilessly martyred Imam Husain (a.s.), his family and friends
Was a transgressor who committed sins publicly and announced his disbelief freely becoming a part of the renowned poems of Ibn al-Zab’ari, which he (Yazid) recited in joy when the severed head of Imam Husain (a.s.) was brought to him.
He was the one who ordered Muslim Ibn Aqabah to kill and plunder the people of Madinah on three occasions. During these attacks, he killed a number of companions and the city of Madinah was totally ransacked. It was during these attacks that more than 1000 Muslim virgins were raped and whenever a Muslim from Madinah offered his daughter in marriage, he did not guarantee her virginity saying, ‘Perhaps, she has lost her virginity during the Tragedy of Haraa.’ It is said that four thousand illegitimate children were born after this incident. Muslim, in his Saheeh, reports that the Messenger of Allah (s.a.w.a.) warned, ‘Whoever frightens the people of Madinah, Allah will frighten him and upon him is the curse of Allah, the angels and all mankind.’[1]
Waaqedi narrates on the authority of Abdullah Ibn Hanzalah, ‘By Allah! We did not visit Yazid but that we feared a stone falling on our heads from the sky (as a divine punishment) because he was a man who married his mothers, daughters and sisters, drank wine, did not pray[2] and he is the one who had ordered the attack on the Holy Ka’bah.

Suyuti and others report on the authority of Nawfil Ibn Abi al-Furaat, “I was with Umar Ibn Abd al-Aziz, when a person while mentioning Yazid, said, ‘the chief of the faithfuls, Yazid Ibn Muawiyyah’. On hearing this, Umar Ibn Abd al-Aziz (became angry) and asked, ‘You call Yazid as Ameerul Momineen?’ and ordered that he be whipped 20 lashes.”[3]

It is mentioned in Al-Sawaaeq that it was said to S’ad Ibn Hassaan, ‘The Bani Umayyah claim that the caliphate is among them.’ He retorted, ‘The sons of the blue-eyed (referring to Hind �” the wife of Abu Sufyaan) are lying. They are mere kings; nay, the worst of kings.’

Abd al-Malik Ibn Marwan

How on earth can these traditions be applied for the caliphate of Abd al-Malik, the treacherous, the one who prohibited the Islamic injunction of enjoining good (ا�…ر بال�…عروف).

Suyuti records, ‘Among the evil deeds of Abd al-Malik was the appointment of Hajjaaj as a governor for the Muslims and the sahaabaa (r.a.), who was degrading and insulting them through killings, assault, abuse and imprisonments. Indeed, he killed innumerable sahaabaa and great taabe’een, apart from the ordinary folks. He put a seal around the neck of Anas and other companions with the intent of degrading them. May Allah not have mercy on him and may Allah not forgive him.’[4]

Waleed Ibn Yazid Ibn Abd al-Malik

How on earth can these traditions be applied for a person like Waleed Ibn Yazid Ibn Abd al-Malik, the sinner, the alcoholic and the one who did not care for the prohibitions of Allah? He is the one who went for Hajj to drink wine atop the Holy Ka’bah, for which he received outright condemnation from the people.[5] He is the one who opened the Holy Quran and on seeing the verse, واستفتحوا و خاب كل�’ جب�’ار عنيد And they asked for judgment and every insolent oppressor was disappointed [6], he flung it on the ground and shot it with an arrow, reciting,

Are you threatening me with the (words of) insolent oppressor?

Here, I am that insolent and oppressor

When you (Quran) are brought on the Day of Gathering by your Lord

Say, O Lord, Waleed has ripped me apart.[7]

He continued to live in vulgar opulence and luxury till he was killed.

Is this the might and respect of Islam? Is this the representation of the Messenger of Allah (s.a.w.a.)?

It is reported that when he left for Hajj, he carried along with himself dogs in trunks, got a dome fabricated as per the size of the Ka’bah to place it on its top and carried a few trunks of wine. By this he intended to place the dome on the Ka’bah and sit in it to drink wine. But his advisors dissuaded him from doing so fearing the wrath of the people. Waleed finally relented.[8]

Masoodi reports on the authority of Mubarrad, ‘Waleed has recited some poems in which he has overtly proclaimed disbelief, and while mentioning the Prophet (s.a.w.a.), he said:

The Hashemites played with the caliphate

(Actually) neither any revelation came, nor did any Book descend

And say to Allah to stop me, my food

And say to Allah to stop me, my drink.[9]

Is’haaq Ibn Muhammad al-Azraq recounts, ‘I went to Mansoor Ibn Jahoor al-Azdi after the murder of Waleed. He had two maids from the slave-girls of Waleed… One of them said, ‘We were among his favorite and most respected slave-girls. He went to bed with her (indicating to the other slave girl), when the call for the prayer (azaan) was made. He ordered her to lead the prayers of the people while she was drunk, unclean and veiled.’[10]

Suyuti brings a narration from the Musnad of Ahmad: “A man will come for this nation, called Waleed, who will be more oppressive to his people than Fir’aun was for his nation.”[11]

Therefore, it will be more apt to name such persons as Fir’aun than the Caliphs (of the Messenger of Allah (s.a.w.a.)) as they resemble the disbelievers and the apostates more than the companions of Prophet Eesaa (a.s.) or the chiefs of the Bani Israel.

If we so desire, we can exhaust the discussion on the likes of the Bani Umayyah but we intend to cut it short due to fear of prolongation.

We say: How can Qazi Ayaaz be satisfied with appointing these tyrants as the caliphs of the Messenger of Allah (s.a.w.a.), about whom he (s.a.w.a.) has given tidings, and has informed that they will act with guidance and that if they were not there, the world will be destroyed with its inhabitants, and that till they exist, the Islamic nation will continue to survive and that they are like the chiefs (نقباء) of the Bani Israel.

Even more stunning is their omission of Imam Hasan (a.s.) from the narration, despite the fact that he (a.s.) was clearly named as a caliph in the traditions narrated from his grandfather, the Messenger of Allah (s.a.w.a.), and the inclusion of Yazid, Moawiyah and Bani al-Aas, whom he (s.a.w.a.) has cursed in these traditions.

And why did they not include Umar Ibn Abd al-Aziz among these caliphs?

(Abridged from the English translation of the book ‘Muntakhab al-Asar’, vol. 1, (published by Naba Publications, Tehran, Islamic Republic of Iran) by Ayatollah Lotfollah Saafi Golpaygani (may Allah prolong his life))!

[1] Murooj al-Zahab, vol. 3, pg. 69.

[2] Taarikh al-Khulafaa, pg. 209

[3] Al-Sawaaeq al-Mohreqah, pg. 219, printed at Cairo; Taarikh al-Khulafaa, pg. 209, printed at Egypt

[4] Taarikh al-Khulafaa, pg. 220

[5] Taarikh al-Khulafaa, pg. 250; Taarikh al-Tabari, vol. 7, pg. 209

[6] Surah Ibraheem (14): Verse 15

[7] Murooj al-Zahab, vol. 3, pg. 216

[8] Al-Kaamil fi al-Taarikh, vol. 3, pg. 394

[9] Murooj al-Zahab, vol. 3, pg. 216.

[10] Al-Eqd al-Fareed, vol. 2, pg. 290.

[11] Taarikh al-Khulafa, pg. 251

Sahih Bukhari and Sahih Muslim are the two most revered Sunni books. The followers of these books claim that these are Sahih (all the traditions mentioned in these books are authentic and correct).

Let us see in short what these two books have mentioned regarding the conduct of the Prophet (s.a.w.a.) with respect to mourning over the dead.

Let us first see the tradition from Sahih-e-Muslim:

Umme Salamah reported, “When Abu Salamah died I said, “I am a stranger in a strange land; I shall weep for him in a manner that would be talked of. I made preparation for weeping for him when a woman from the upper side of the city came there who intended to help me (in weeping). She happened to come across the Messenger of Allah (s.a.w.a.) who said, “Do you intend to bring the devil into a house from which Allah has twice driven him out? I (Umme Salamah), therefore, refrained from weeping and I did not weep. (Book #004, Hadith #2007)

In the above tradition the Prophet (s.a.w.a.) has prohibited weeping over the dead for it brings the devil into the house.

Now let us see what is mentioned in Bukhari.

Narrated Anas bin Malik, “We were (in the funeral procession) of one of the daughters of the Prophet and he was sitting by the side of the grave. I saw his eyes shedding tears.” (Book #23, Hadith #374)

From the above tradition we see that the Prophet (s.a.w.a.) wept for his daughter.

Analysis
1. Both books are claimed to be Sahih and authentic.
2. There are contradictory traditions in each book.
3. As per one tradition the Prophet (s.a.w.a.) is prohibiting from crying over the dead while as per the other he himself is crying over his dead daughter.
4. So either one of the books is not Sahih or the Prophet (s.a.w.a.) is not practicing what he is preaching.
5. If only one of the books is Sahih, then the authenticity of the other is in doubt.
6. If both are Sahih, then the authenticity of the Prophet (s.a.w.a.) is in doubt.

With the advent of Muharram, arrives the false propaganda against mourning and weeping over the dead from the so called followers of true Islam.

While these Muslims disagree with the Shias on the point of whether to weep or not, let us see whether two of their very revered personalities, Umar and Ayesha had a common view on this issue.

It is narrated from Saeed b. Musayyab that Ayesha mourned over her father after his death. When this news reached Umar, he ordered prohibition against it, but Ayesha rejected the caliph’s order. Then Hesham b. Walid was ordered to go to Ayesha and stop her from mourning loudly. As soon as the women acted as per Hesham’s order, they left the house and Umar addressed them saying, ‘Do you intend to chastise Abu Bakr by your weeping? Surely the dead are chastised due to weeping over them.’

(Sahih Tirmizi: tradition 1002)

From the above incident it can be concluded that:
1. If the Prophet (s.a.w.a.) had actually prohibited weeping over the dead (as Umar claimed), then by crying, Ayesha disobeyed the Prophet’s (s.a.w.a.) order.

2. It can be argued that she must have been overcome by her emotions, but when Umar ordered her not to weep, she did not obey him thereby disobeying the so-called caliph of Muslims.

This makes Ayesha someone who
a. did not follow the Prophet’s (s.a.w.a.) tradition
b. was overcome by her emotions
c. disobeyed the so-called caliph

Yet, Bukhari has recorded many traditions from her in his Sahih.

A section of the Muslims who find themselves in a spot while defending Yazid’s role in killing Imam Husain (a.s.) make lame excuses and indulge in Shia-bashing as if maligning Shias is the answer to all their woes. Among their most ludicrous claims is that the Shias themselves killed Imam Husain (a.s.) and are now repenting for the same.

Read the below 5 point article to this allegation against the Shias.

Doubt

A section of the Muslims who find themselves in a spot while defending Yazid’s role in killing Imam Husain (a.s.) make lame excuses and indulge in Shia-bashing as if maligning Shias is the answer to all their woes. Among their most ludicrous claims is that the Shias themselves killed Imam Husain (a.s.) and are now repenting for the same.

Reply

1. Who killed Hamzah?

2. Role of companions

3. Yazid’s role

4. Who are the Shias?

5. Yazid’s forces were not Shias

Who killed Hamzah (a.s.)?

Who killed Ammar?

This lame excuse reminds one of the argument advanced by Yazid’s father nearly 1,400 years ago when he found himself similarly cornered in Siffeen on the count of being responsible for Ammar’s (r.a.) death, a fact prophesied by the Holy Prophet (s.a.w.a.).

To deflect blame for killing Ammar b. Yasir (r.a.), one of the greatest companions for whom Paradise was assured, Muawiyah conveniently shifted the blame for the crime of murdering Ammar to Ameerul Momineen (a.s.) Ali b. Abi Talib (a.s.) by suggesting that since Ali (a.s.) had got Ammar to the Battle of Siffeen, he was the one responsible for killing Ammaar and not Muawiyah.

Going by Muawiyah’s rationale the Prophet (s.a.w.a.) is likewise responsible for killing his own uncle Hamzah who came to the Battlefield of Ohad on his (s.a.w.a.) instruction!

Apparently, shifting the blame from the perpetrator of the crime to those who are the farthest in committing it is the most favored response of these Muslims.

Let us see how we can identify the perpetrators of other crimes using the rationale of these Muslims.

Who killed Hamzah (a.s.)?

1. Of course, conventional wisdom suggests as backed by history that the responsibility for killing Hamzah (a.s.) lies with the infidels of Mecca who waged war against the Holy Prophet (s.a.w.a.) and Muslims.

2. And we have also seen that according to Muawiyah’s rationale, the responsibility for killing Hamzah (a.s.) was with the Holy Prophet (s.a.w.a.).

3. According to the rationale of these Muslims, the responsibility for Hamzah’s death lies with another group altogether. Let’s refer to the 153rd verse of Surah Aale Imran (3) to find the answer:

‘When you ran off precipitately and did not wait for anyone, the Apostle was calling you from your rear…’

Since according to these Muslims, the treachery of the Shias killed Imam Husain (a.s.), it follows that the treachery of the companions in the Battle of Ohad killed Hamzah (a.s.).

However, for obvious reasons these Muslims won’t admit this fact and will apply their rationale selectively against the Shias.

Who killed Usman?

1. Conventional wisdom suggests that Usman was killed by the Muslims who laid siege to his house and ultimately killed him for his misguided policies.

2. But according to the rationale of these Muslims who put the blame squarely on those who act treacherously, the blame for killing Usman lies with his cousin – Muawiyah b. Abu Sufyan.

It is not a secret that the siege on Usman’s house lasted for over a month during which time he sent SOS to, among others, his cousin Muawiyah. However, for the period Usman was under siege which was considerable, Muawiyah did not send in his army to bail out Usman. This despite the fact that Muawiyah had a huge army at his disposal which only two years later took on the might of the entire Muslim army in Siffeen.

If Muawiyah had shown the same alacrity and enthusiasm in sending help to Medina to rescue Usman, that his son Yazid showed after ascending the throne to demand allegiance from Imam Husain (a.s.) in Medina, Usman’s life could well have been saved. Regardless, does this mean that Usman was a victim of Muawiyah’s treachery rather than the Muslims who actually killed him?

Going by the argument of these Muslims, the answer is yes – Muawiyah killed Usman.

Role of companions

Who killed Imam Husain (a.s.)?

According to this group of Muslims, Imam Husain (a.s.) was a victim of treachery by the Shias.

First and foremost if blame must be placed based on treachery, the companions and taabe’een displayed it in ample measure by not supporting Imam Husain (a.s.) against Yazid.

Treachery of the companions and taabe’een

علمائے اہل ِسنت (امام جلال الدین سیوطی،محدث شاہ عبدالعزیز دہلوی
امام سعد الدین تفتازانی وغےرہ) کا اقرار کہ معاویہ باغی تھا اور اسکے علاوہ صحابی ِرسول حضرت عمار بن یاسر (رض) کی شہادت اس بات کا قطعی ثبوت ہے کہ معاویہ باغی تھا
چلو ہم سلفیوں کے امام قاضی شوکانی کی کتابنیل الاوطار مے باغی کے بارے مے پڑھتے ہےں

امام ِوقت کے خلاف بغاوت کرنا مسجد میں زنا کرنے کے مترادف ہے
قاضی شوکانی نیل الاوطار، ج 7 ص 198 میں لکھتے ہیں:
واعلم أن قتال البغاة جائز إجماعا كما حكي ذلك في البحر ولا يبعد أن يكون واجبا لقوله تعالى { فقاتلوا التي تبغي } وقد حكي في البحر أيضا عن العترة جميعا أن جهادهم أفضل من جهاد الكفار إلى ديارهم إذ فعلهم في دار الإسلام كفعل الفاحشة في المسجد
یہ معلوم ہونا چاہیئے کہ اس بات پر اجماع ہے کہ باغی کے خلاف لڑنا جائز ہے جیسا کہ البحر میں درج ہے بلکہ اللہ تعالیٰ کے اس قول کے مطابق تو ایسا کرنا واجب ہے: "فقاتلوا التي تبغي" اور البحر میں یہ بھی درج ہے کہ تمام عترت کا کہنا ہے کہ باغیوں سے لڑنا کفار سے ان کی زمین پر لڑنے سے زیادہ افضل ہے کیونکہ باغیوں کا مسلمانوں کی زمین پر بغاوت کرنا مسجد میں زنا کرنے کے مترادف ہے۔

مام جلال الدین سیوطی اپنی کتاب تاریخ خلفاء، ص 200 میں لکھتے ہیںI:

زھری نماز ِعید کے حوالے سے کہتے ہیں کہ نماز سے قبل خطبہ دینے والا پہلا شخص معاویہ ہے۔

امام شافعی اپنی کتاب ’الام‘ ج ا ص 392 میں لکھتے ہیں

أخبرنا الشافعي قال أخبرنا إبراهيم قال حدثني داود بن الحصين عن عبد الله بن يزيد الخطمي ‏(‏أن النبي -صلى الله عليه وسلم- وأبا بكر وعمر وعثمان كانوا يبتدئون بالصلاة قبل الخطبة حتى قدم معاوية فقدم الخطبة‏)‏۔

امام شافعی کہتے ہیں کہ عبداللہ بن یزید الخطمی کا قول ہے کہ رسول اللہ (ص)، ابو بکر، عمر اور عثمان خطبہ سے قبل نماز ادا کرتے تھے حتی کہ معاویہ آیا اور اس نے خطبہ کو نماز سے قبل کردیا

ابن کثیر البدایہ والنہایہ، ج 8 ص 139 میں لکھتے ہیں:

وقال قتادة‏:‏ عن سعيد بن المسيب‏:‏ أول من أذن وأقام يوم الفطر والنحر معاوية‏.

قتادہ نے سعید بن المسیب سے بیان کیا ہے کہ معاویہ وہ پہلا شخص تھا جس نے عیدالفطر اور عیدالاضحیٰ کے دوران اذان اور اقامت کہی۔

امام ابن حجر عقسلانی نے فتح الباری شرح صحیح بخاری، ج 2 ص 529 میں اس معاملہ کو مزید واضح کیا ہے:

اس بات پر اختلاف ہے کہ کس نے نماز ِعید میں اذان متعارف کرائی۔ ابن شیبہ نے ایک صحیح سند سے اس کام کو معاویہ کی طرف منسوب کیا ہے جبکہ شافعی کا کہنا ہے کہ یہ بصرہ میں ابن زیاد نے کیا اور داؤد کا کہنا ہے اسے مروان نے شروع کیا، لیکن روایات کی اکثریت اس سے متفق نہیں۔ اسے معاویہ نے شروع کیا بالکل اسی طرح جس طرح اس نے نماز ِعید سے قبل خطبہ شروع کردیا تھا۔

تو اس مرتبہ معاویہ کی مرضی کی تلوار نماز ِعید پر گری۔ جی ہاں ورنہ اصل طریقہ کیا ہے وہ ہم صحیح مسلم میں یوں پڑھتے ہیں:

وحدثنا محمد بن عبد الله بن نمير، حدثنا أبي، حدثنا عبد الملك بن أبي سليمان، عن عطاء، عن جابر بن عبد الله، قال شهدت مع رسول الله صلى الله عليه وسلم الصلاة يوم العيد فبدأ بالصلاة قبل الخطبة بغير أذان ولا إقامة ثم قام متوكئا على بلال فأمر

حضرت جابر بن عبداللہ نے فرمایا کہ میں نے رسول اللہ (ص) کے ساتھ نماز ِعید ادا کی۔ انہوں (ص) نے خطبہ سے قبل نماز ادا کی بغیر اذان اور اقامت کے۔
صحیح مسلم، حدیث 2085

ویسے تو رسول اللہ (ص) کا مندرجہ بالا عمل نواصب کو بتانے کے لئے کافی ہونا چاہئے کہ جس معاویہ کا وہ احترام و تکریم کرتے ہیں وہ کتنا بڑا گستاخ ِرسول تھا کہ اس نے رسول اللہ (ص) کے عمل کو مکمل اور حجت نہ تسلیم کیا اور خود ہی شریعت میں تبدیلیاں کردیں لیکن پھر بھی ہم نماز ِعید کا درست طریقہ کار امام مالک کے حوالے سے بھی پیش کیے دیتے ہیں۔ موطا مالک، کتاب العیدین، حدیث 431:

حدثني يحيى، عن مالك، أنه سمع غير، واحد، من علمائهم يقول لم يكن في عيد الفطر ولا في الأضحى نداء ولا إقامة منذ زمان رسول الله صلى الله عليه وسلم إلى اليوم ‏.‏ قال مالك وتلك السنة التي لا اختلاف فيها عندنا ‏.‏

امام مالک نے کتنے علماء کو فرماتے ہوئے سنا کہ عید الفطر اور عید الاضحیٰ کی رسول اللہ (ص) کے زمانے سے آج تک اذان و اقامت نہیں ہوئی۔ امام مالک نے فرمایا کہ یہ ایک ایسی سنت ہے جس میں ہمارے نزدیک کوئی اختلاف نہیں۔
موطا مالک، کتاب العیدین، حدیث 431

اللہ اکبر
کیا اب بھی کسی ناصبی ابن تیمیہ کی اہلبیت (ع) دشمنی پر شک ہے؛؛؛
Written by Kamaal Haider