Tradition One
The darling of the Nasibi movement Qadhi Mazhar Husayn in his book
‘Ham Matam kyo nahee kartay’ [Why do not we perform mourning] said:
Imam Ja’far Sadiq (as) has said that patience and hardships,
both comes to the believer, hence on the appearance of hardships, he
exhibit patience and adversities impatience comes to kafir hence on the
appearance of adversities, he exhibits signs of Jaza’
Al-Kafi, Volume 3 page 223
Al-Kafi, Volume 3 page 223
Reply
The Nasibi does not know the true meaning of ‘patience’ – its is
Nasibi perception that those who stay quite during grief and hardships
and refraining from wailing and crying are considered patient. The
reality is that wailing and crying does not negate the concept of
patience while complaining and holding Allah (swt) responsible for the
adversities during hardships constitutes impatience, i.e. commenting on
an act due to a lack of knowledge is impatience.
The story of Musa (as) and Khider (as) mentioned in Qur’an serves as a
proof for our notion. As Musa (as) asked Khider (as) that He wanted to
go with him and wanted to learn the things which Khider (as) had learnt
from Ilm-e-Ladunni. Khider (as) told Musa (as) that He didn’t possess
patience and how would he endure a matter that he lacked knowledge of.
Prophet Musa (as) told him that “Inshallah”, he will find Khider (as)
enduring and would not oppose anything Khider (as) did. Despite this,
when Khider (as) made an hole in the boat and Khider (as) said that
hadn’t, Khider (as) said he failed to maintain patience. The same reply
was given to Musa (as) by Khider (as) when he (as) commented on the
killing of servant by Khider (as). The verse proves that lack of ‘Sabr’
involves commenting on mater that you lack knowledge of.
In the eyes of Ulema, the definition of patience is that the ‘self’
shall not indulge in an unsound act. True patience is that exhibited in
war, and refers to not fleeing the battlefield.
The terms ‘Sabr’ [patience] means not to complain about Allah (swt)
before any other than God. We have the example of Prophet Yaqub (as) who
maintained this high level of patience even after his lamentation. as
he complained about his adversities to Allah (swt) as we have already
mentioned.
Unless someone issues a complaint at adversities to persons other
than Allah (swt), merely weeping and chest beating does not fall under
the category of impatience.
The tradition makes no reference to the prohibition of mourning etc
rather the condition of two classes are being discussed that a believer
is he who stands firm on his iman and his endurance is unshakable whilst
a Kâfir complains and holds Allah responsible for his calamity and
suffering and hence shows impatience.
During the pre Islamic era, it was the tradition of these people to
wail and cry at adversities blaming all on Taqdir, they would recite
poetry wherein they commented on the wisdom of Allah and how they
exhibited impatience. The same thing has been mentioned in this
tradition. To advance a weak Hadeeth and twist in effort to prove that
mourning for Imam Husayn (as) is Haraam is fitting of these Nawasib.
Tradition Two – The Definition of Jaza
Jabir said: ‘I asked Abu Jaffar (as) about the grief (Jaza).
He replied: ‘The climax of grief is to scream and woe, beating the
cheek, face, chest and pulling the hair. Whoever made a mourning
assembly verily he abandoned patience and followed the other way but
whoever was patient and mentioned Allah and praised him, verily he is
pleased by Allah’s will, therefore he will be rewarded by Allah. But
whoever doesnt do this, he will be judged and he is condemned and Allah
will not reward him’
Furu al-Kafi, Volume 1 page 121
Bihar al-Anwar, Volume 79 page 89
Furu al-Kafi, Volume 1 page 121
Bihar al-Anwar, Volume 79 page 89
Reply One – The tradition has been graded as weak
Allamah Majisi in his book Mirat al-Uqool, Volume 14 page 181 has declared it a weak tradition.
Reply Two
Even for the sake of discussion we suppose the tradition was
authentic, than the only meaning which we get from this is to mourn
while going out of the mentioned limits is impatience and illegitimate.
In pre Islamic age people during the adversities and when confronted by
clamities, used to wail and cry and create poetries based on
inappropriate words for Allah (swt) and the condemnation we just read in
the tradition is for the very absurd customs. But in the Azadari of
Imam Husayn (as) maintains the high prestige of Allah (swt), we don’t
commit any blasphemy against Allah (swt) and our lamentation would not
be defined by our Imam (as) as Jaza. When it comes to Imam Husayn (as)
such mourning is valid and legitimate! The Shi’a do not conduct Azadari
for ordinary people, we reserve it for Imam Husayn (as), these acts are
in accordance with dictates of the Qur’an and Sunnah.
RasoolAllah said
Justice shall rule my Ummah until the first individual who shall destroy my Deen, from the Banu Ummayaa his name shall be Yazeed.
al Bidayah Volume 8 page 204:
Ibn Asakir in his history book states. When Husayn's head was brought before Yazeed, he recited the couplets of Ibn Zubayri: 'I wish my ancestors of Badr were here to see the fright of al-Khazraj (tribe) as the spears hit.
"It is already mentioned that he (Yazeed) killed al-Hussain and his companions through Ubaidullah bin Zyad"
Al-Muqadima by Ibn Khaldun, page 254:
It is impermissible to support Yazeed in the matter of killing Hussain, nay (Hussain's) murder is Yazeed's deed that proves him to be a Fasiq and Hussain a martyr.
The cruel people of Syria and Iraq upon orders of impure Yazeed and due to the efforts of chief of hatred and fitnah of Ibn Ziyad martyred Imam Hussain..
He (Yazeed) wrote to Ubaydullah Ibn Ziyad ordering him to march towards Madina and surround Ibn Zubayr in Makka. He (Ibn ziyad) replied: 'I can't give both these things to this Fasiq, after killing the grandson of Rasulullah (s)
Muhammad bin al-Dahak narrated from his father that he said: When Hussain marched, Yazeed wrote to his governor Ibn Ziyad saying: Hussain is marching to Kufa and he is a problem of your time not of other times, your state not of other states and you not for the other governors. At that time you might be free or be slaved. Therefore Ibn Ziad killed him and sent his head to him (Yazeed).
He also writes about the comments made by the Head of this delegation, Mundhir bin Zubair, upon his return from Basra, where he had gone to meet his friend, Yazid consumes so much intoxicants that he misses prayers!
Ibn Kathir writes about the delegation, comprising three citizens of Madina, going to Yazid. He says: When they returned to Madina, they made public their grave findings pertaining to Yazids perversities. They said: We are returning from that person who is irreligious, who is a wine-bibber and who is surrounded by singing girls, entertaining him with music.
Yazid was notorious for his love of music and liquors his illicit friendship with singing boys and girls There was not a single day that he woke up not intoxicated